I think we need to buck up some of the House Dems who are sounding too wobbly today.We Need to Call.

[Pirate Smile]

Me to Barney Frank :wtf:

Ezra Klein writes today:

Demoralized Democrats

Reader MK writes:

I've voted for Democrats all my life. I've campaigned for and donated to the Democratic Party. But if they say they can't or won't go any further on health care because they only have 59 votes in the Senate, they deserve to lose.

I'm hearing a lot of this. Last night, I was talking to a committed Democrat. A Massachusetts Democrat, in fact. And her despair was persuasive. "I didn't vote for a party that would abandon my agenda because it lost one seat in the Senate," she said. "The party I voted for, and want to be part of, would recognize political opportunity in the waning days of its supermajority and pass what it could pass, and then keep coming back for more."

The loss in Massachusetts was a terrible disappointment to Democrats. But it can be explained away. Martha Coakley was a terrible candidate. Scott Brown ran an excellent campaign. These things happen.

But the reaction congressional Democrats have had to Coakley's loss has been much more shattering. It has been a betrayal.

The fundamental pact between a political party and its supporters is that the two groups believe the same thing and pledge to work on it together. And the Democratic base feels that it has held to its side of the bargain. It elected a Democratic majority and a Democratic president. It swallowed tough compromises on the issues it cared about most. It swallowed concessions to politicians it didn't like and industry groups it loathed. But it persisted. Because these things are important. That's why those voters believe in them. That's why they're Democrats.

But the party looks ready to abandon them because Brown won a special election in Massachusetts -- even though Democrats can pass the bill after Brown is seated. What that says is crucial: Whereas the base thought it was making these hard compromises and getting up early to knock on doors because these issues are important, the party thought all that was happening because, well, it's hard to say. It was electorally convenient? People need something to do? Ted Kennedy wanted it done?

If Democrats let go of health care, there is no doubt that a demoralized Democratic base will stay home in November. And that's as it should be. If the Democratic Party won't uphold its end of the bargain, there's no reason its base should pretend the deal is still on.

By Ezra Klein | January 20, 2010; 11:29 AM ET

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/01/demoralized_democrats.html

Call and tell them to pass the Senate Bill then patch it through Reconcilliation. Get it done and move on to the jobs, the economy, nailing the banks and Wall Street.

Dropping HCR now gives us all of the pain with absolutely no gain or progress for it in any way, completely demoralizes the base and leaves the uninsured and people with pre-existing conditions, etc. in the same horrible position.

Congressional switchboard [phone]

[CreekDog]

1. I agree and I contacted my congressperson yesterday

essentially saying the same thing.

letting HCR go is not an option.

[ShortnFiery]

2. One suggestion: Call them "weak kneed"? The word "wobbly" will always be banished for me

after that HAG Tory, Maggie Thatcher said to Saint Reagan, "Don't go wobbly on me."

For some reason, I can't get that visual "Maggie to Ronnie" out of my head. :silly: