Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MASSIVE Doc Dump - IG Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:18 PM
Original message
MASSIVE Doc Dump - IG Report
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 10:25 PM by kpete
The Inspector General's report on the FBI's abuse of national security letters to obtain phone records using made-up terror emergencies was released today and is available here.
http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/s1001r.pdf
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2010/1/20/213035/384

.................

The ACLU weighs in, "OMG, 2000 Emergencies That Never Were."
It should surprise no one that the phone companies are forking over your info with as little as a "pretty please" from the FBI.
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/omg-oig-2000-emergencies-werent-there

.........

The Exigent Letter IG Report

massive document (Beware! 306 page PDF), even the Table of Contents (page 4) has dynamite stuff that just jumps out at you:

…III. Inaccurate Statements
to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

A. FISA Case No. 1
B. FISA Case No. 2
C. FISA Case No. 3
D. FISA Case No. 4
E. OIG Analysis…

By: emptywheel Wednesday January 20, 2010 6:43 pm
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/01/20/outside-the-courtroom-sassy-parody-and-cindy-mccain/#comment-214752

.............

IG Report.

Further statements in the document show that the FBI/DOJ’s use of Hot Number Trapping without a court order are illegal and violate the Pen Register Act.

.......................

3 companies (A,B,C) involved?

AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint? Not Quest?



http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/s1001r.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder, do people care anymore about government spying?
I'm not sure if the vast majority of people in the U.S. even think it should be against the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Everyone seemed to care under the Bush II Regime
now, not so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Important story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who would have thought that a process with essentially no oversight would be abused?
It is just unimaginable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I know; what could possibly go wrong?
:eyes:

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R Thanks, kpete!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have to say...
www.indictbushnow.org
pleeeeeeeeeeeeze!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Heads need to roll, including those who ordered the illegal spying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Page 30 on 43, Activity rises and falls around questionable 2004 elections.
And it drops of to almost nothing on either side of the election.

Makes me wonder how much of this had to do with tapping Democratic strategies before the election, and tapping Ohio recount calls after the election.

One thing to note, they block out things they continue to hide on these pdfs much better than they used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Before 9/11 they would not even try to look, around Nov 2004, they look a lot.
Top FBI in Washington would not allow a field office even SUBMIT a FISA request to look at the 20th hijacker's computer before 9/11 because it might be rejected. (FISA court took thousands of requests and only rejected a couple and helped the requesters to finally get approval on those.) Later, Bush himself awarded those FBI deniers.

Around the 2004 elections, they don't worry anymore. They lie to FISA and skip over FISA.

Nation of laws my left butt cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC