Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem Senator Trying to Block F-14 Parts from being sold to Iran!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:11 PM
Original message
Dem Senator Trying to Block F-14 Parts from being sold to Iran!
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 06:12 PM by cynatnite
WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator is trying to block the Pentagon from selling spare parts from its recently retired F-14 fleet that are coveted by Iran.

Sen. Ron Wyden (news, bio, voting record)'s bill came in response to an investigation by The Associated Press that found weaknesses in surplus-sale security that allowed buyers for countries including Iran and China to obtain sensitive U.S. military equipment including Tomcat parts.

The Oregon Democrat's legislation would ban the Defense Department from selling surplus F-14 parts and prohibit buyers who have already acquired surplus Tomcat parts from exporting them. Wyden's bill, the Stop Arming Iran Act, is co-sponsored by the Senate's No. 2 lawmaker, Democratic Whip Richard Durbin (news, bio, voting record) of Illinois.

"It just defies common sense to be making this kind of equipment available to the Iranians with all that they have done that is against our interests," Wyden said Monday in an interview, adding that constituents brought up the surplus-sale security problems at his town-hall meetings over the past few days. "I just want to legislate this and cut it off permanently, once and for all."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070129/ap_on_go_co/military_surplus_stings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wyden
That is my Senator Ron Wyden D-OR!!!!!!!


You go Ron!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Mine, too!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. War is our major export.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. There needs to be legislation against this?
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 06:14 PM by rockymountaindem
The DoD would seriously consider allowing these parts to be exported? Holy cow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Parts are being sold in lots, to brokers who are
then selling them to Iran. The funny thing is it came up as part of an investigation to figure out where Iran was getting the parts. The investigators got ahold of some parts and when they traced their origin they figured out the parts came from... The Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is it normal for an arms dealer to supply both sides of a conflict
When he himself is one of the sides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Considerig that whole Military-Industrial Complex thing, of course it's
normal.

The more stuff both sides have, the more of each other's stuff they can blow up, and the more stuff will need replacement. What part of win-win don't you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, shit, the war won't be any fun
if they can't fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. LOL
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 06:20 PM by halobeam
keep your sense of humor or your (and mine) head will EXPLODE!:rofl:

RECOMMENDED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronScorpio5 Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sure.....
iran wants those parts for purely non-military purposes....just like their nuclear reactor.

yup, seeing the poorly misunderstood iran with nukes and fully functioning f-14's is great. That'll keep the rest of area in line.


/ sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. hey if we don't sell em parts, how can we accuse them of having them?
duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry, I've misplaced my scorecard
Isn't the US, like, mad at them or something?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. The gall. The posturing. We all know he would rather send them
whole F-14's for some tropical fruit. Mangoes we got, I take it.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Since Iran and Russia have such and good relationship ecconomic-wise...
...Why don't they trade those F-14 to the russians and buy some SU-27's instead (It's a better deal IMO).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Explain to me why they [the gvmt] can ignore the "embargoed countries" list...
Last time I checked (about 2 weeks ago) the most restricted destinations for exports are the embargoed countries and those countries designated as supporting terrorist activities, including Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria. (per the DOC)

So how is it our government can get around this list and US corporations can not ? If this is another case of the rules don't apply, then I would like to know why this is not used in court when public corporations are fined (with possible loss of export rights) for doing exactly the same thing.

MZr7



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is what grandstanding is for. Please please please slime them with this!
Aiding and abedding the enemy. Traitors!

Let's get hysterical on this one. It'll be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC