Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Survivor: Palau’ contestant Jennifer Lyon has died at 37

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:00 AM
Original message
‘Survivor: Palau’ contestant Jennifer Lyon has died at 37
‘Survivor: Palau’ contestant Jennifer Lyon has died at 37


She had been diagnosed with stage-three breast cancer shortly after she finished shooting the CBS contest, on which she placed fourth. Firefighter Tom Westman won that edition of the reality series in 2005.

Lyon died Tuesday night at her home in Oregon.

On her Web site, she had a message for her fans: “Thank you so much to everyone for sending their encouragement and prayers. It means so much to me and every single one is appreciated. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart.”

Jeff Probst recalled Jenn in a four-page note. He concluded by saying:

“Jenn did such a good job of showing me how to love someone who is dying that it is surprisingly easy to talk about her passing. I feel there is great knowledge she wanted to share with others about how to deal with someone who is dying.

“Throughout her battle with cancer, friends would often encourage her to ‘Fight harder. Stay positive.’ It’s a well-intentioned gesture but as I learned through Jenn, it’s not always the right one. Near the end, Jenn worried that some people may think she gave up and didn’t fight hard enough. We talked a lot about the idea that death is such a hard subject and so many of us simply don’t know what is appropriate to say so we end up saying the wrong thing for all the right reasons.

http://tinyurl.com/ylb6or4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because of that last paragraph, I can't recommend this highly enough.
People really need to get a clue about how to listen to hurting people.

Thanks for posting this.... it has a lot to offer to people who really want to be there for those who are suffering!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Barbara Ehrenreich has talked about this recently
the whole "always be positive" crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. that is one journalist I have a tremendous respect for.
Can you tell me where I can find what she has written about that? I'd love to see it!

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. here is one link , but there are others and she has talked on tv about it also
she writes about her own experience when she got breast cancer. (i believe she is ok now)

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/books/10ehrenreich.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh wonderful! I love it!
Bookmarked, until I can print it out.

Thank you so much!

I don't have a TV (my car doesn't have cable), so I very much appreciate you being helpful, rather than brushing me off with the standard DU "google is your friend" crap.

this is just the spirit-lifter I needed right now... Thanks! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Here's a link to her whole column on cancer
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 12:38 AM by XemaSab
http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/cancerland.htm

There is, I discover, no single noun to describe a woman with breast cancer. As in the AIDS movement, upon which breast-cancer activism is partly modeled, the words "patient" and "victim," with their aura of self-pity and passivity, have been ruled un-P.C. Instead, we get verbs: Those who are in the midst of their treatments are described as "battling' or "fighting," sometimes intensified with "bravely" or "flercely" -- language suggestive of Katharine Hepburn with her face to the wind. Once the treatments are over, one achieves the status of "survivor," which is how the women in my local support group identify themselves, A.A.-style, as we convene to share war stories and rejoice in our "survivorhood": "Hi, I'm Kathy and I'm a three-year survivor." For those who cease to be survivors and join the more than 40,000 American women who succumb to breast cancer each year -- again, no noun applies. They are said to have "lost their battle" and may be memorialized by photographs carried at races for the cure -- our lost, brave sisters, our fallen soldiers. But in the overwhelmingly Darwinian culture that has grown up around breast cancer, martyrs count for little; it is the "survivors" who merit constant honor and acclaim. They, after all, offer living proof that expensive and painful treatments may in some cases actually work.

The effect of this relentless brightsiding is to transform breast cancer into a rite of passage -- not an injustice or a tragedy to rail against, but a normal marker in the life cycle, like menopause or graying hair. Everything in mainstream breast cancer culture serves, no doubt inadvertently, to tame and normalize the disease: the diagnosis may be disastrous, but there are those cunning pink rhinestone angel pins to buy and races to train for. Even the heavy traffic in personal narratives and practical tips, which I found so useful, bears an implicit acceptance of the disease and the current barbarous approaches to its treatment: you can get so busy comparing attractive head scarves that you forget to question a form of treatment that temporarily renders you both bald and immuno-incompetent. Understood as a rite of passage, breast cancer resembles the initiation rites so exhaustively studied by Mircea Eliade: First there is the selection of the initiates -- by age in the tribal situation, by mammogram or palpation here. Then come the requisite ordeals -- scarification or circumcision within traditional cultures, surgery and chemotherapy for the cancer patient. Finally, the initiate emerges into a new and higher status -- an adult and a warrior -- or in the case of breast cancer, a "survivor."

My friend introduces me to a knot of other women in survivor gear, breast-cancer victims all, I learn, though of course I would not use the V-word here. "Does anyone else have trouble with the term 'survivor'?' I ask, and, surprisingly, two or three speak up. It could be "unlucky," one tells me; it "tempts fate," says another, shuddering slightly. After all, the cancer can recur at any time, either in the breast or in some more strategic site. No one brings up my own objection to the term, though: that the mindless triumphalism of "survivorhood" denigrates the dead and the dying. Did we who live "fight" harder than those who've died? Can we claim to be "braver," better, people than the dead? And why is there no room in this cult for some gracious acceptance of death, when the time comes, which it surely will, through cancer or some other misfortune?

No, this is not my sisterhood. For me at least, breast cancer will never be a source of identity or pride. As my dying correspondent Gerri wrote: "IT IS NOT O.K.!" What it is, along with cancer generally or any slow and painful way of dying, is an abomination, and, to the extent that it's manmade, also a crime. This is the one great truth that I bring out of the breast-cancer experience, which did not, I can now report, make me prettier or stronger, more feminine or spiritual -- only more deeply angry. What sustained me through the "treatments" is a purifying rage, a resolve, framed in the sleepless nights of chemotherapy, to see the last polluter, along with, say, the last smug health insurance operative, strangled with the last pink ribbon. Cancer or no cancer, I will not live that long of course. But I know this much right now for sure: I will not go into that last good night with a teddy bear tucked under my arm.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. She is such a brilliant writer! I have bookmarked this to digest fully...
thank you so very much!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. why is breast cancer worse for younger women ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not sure I understand the question:
1. Do you mean 'why do they tend to die more from it'?
or
2. Why do we as a society see it as worse when it affects those younger?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, i meant number 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. most likely because younger women
don't get tested as often as older women.. and their cancer isn't discovered until it's too late. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. i think this person got it when she was 33, or at least that's when she found out
that's pretty young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. 37.
I turned 38 this past year. There but for the Grace of God go I.

Can't imagine that anyone would ever suggest she didn't fight hard enough.

I have never watched this show and have no idea who she is. I'm heartbroken nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Men get breast cancer, too
Our neighbor up the street had a double mastectomy almost ten years ago.

Guys need to do self-exams, just like women do.

In the meantime, I'm with Barbara Ehrenreich, and I'll go even further: What kind of heartless bastards could compel anyone to fight with insurance companies when they're already fighting for their lives?

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. it's heartbreaking.
and she was so young too.. may she rest in peace.. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC