Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow should run for MA Senate in 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:49 AM
Original message
Rachel Maddow should run for MA Senate in 2012
Sorry for the post-and-run, but I have a flight to catch.

As former residents of Massachusetts, my wife and I were talking last night about Rachel Maddow running in 2012 for the Senate seat Brown just won. She maintains a residence in Massachusetts, is well-known in the western part of the state, and appears to be a committed Democrat from her consistent support of Obama. The MA Dems will have their best shot at getting the seat back if somebody "famous" runs.

Think that could work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. If I were in MA I'd vote for her RIGHT NOW...BUT
1) would the party get behind her
2) does she want it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. yeah. if we want to keep that seat in repuke hands
love Maddow right where she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. tell me why
I understand the conventional wisdom, that nobody wants to vote for a big scary liberal, but two days after the Republicans won Kennedy's seat is not a good time to be relying on conventional wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. sure. how many reasons do you need? start with this:
she has never run for political office before. This isn't the time to put a neophyte campaigner up.

She has no experience in governing.

She's a talk show personality who's almost certainly said things that will make great copy for the Brown folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. western mass
just wondering - how is it she is well known in western Mass, other than she lives there? She lives about 25 miles north east of me and I invited her and her spouse out to dinner with my wife and I, but never got a response.

She should do a better job being generous with her personal time with all her fans that live within 25 miles of her. If you ask me.

Rachel serving in the Senate in Teddy's seat would be magnificent!

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Perhaps she just thought that was creepy.
I sure wouldn't accept an invitation to dinner from a complete stranger!

Would anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. correct
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 02:55 PM by 90-percent
Yes, it was creepy.

But, you never know. It was really mostly a fan letter and I'm not bitter.

Also, Rachel and I both drive Ford Rangers. We're almost separated at birth, if I wasn't 20 years older than she is.

-90% Jimmy,

who could really use a "facetious" emoticon for my posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. So a fan asks her out for dinner and you didn't get a response. Color me surprised!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry, but the selfish part of me insists on seeing & listening to her
for an hour every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry, but talk show people rarely make good politicans.
On your show, you look good because you control the subject, dialogue, and can shut off any viewpoints you don't like. You can also pre-research whatever you know will come up. In politics you can rarely control any of these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Scott Brown is preferable?
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. no, an experienced, tough, good campaigner who's a progressive is
preferable. You do know that they exist in MA, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Oh, absolutely. Who do you think would be a good candidate to run against him?
I mean, like names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Michael Capuano? Ed Markey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I can see your logic...
But, I get nervous when highly qualified, long-time Democratic insiders run against Republican pretty-boys for statewide office in MA. Shannon O'Brien and Martha Coakley are just the two most recent examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Martha Coakley is hardly a good example
and shouldn't be compared with reps like Markey and Capuano. One more time. Maddow has ZERO experience either in governing or campaigning. How come that doesn't make you MORE nervous.
Oh, and Brown had a lot of experience in campaigning. Much as it might comfort you to believe it, he ws not merely some pretty boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Maddow is the ONLY person who can defeat Brown? Really? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. wow, that would be interesting, Franken and Maddow reuniting!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Al Franken's election is what got me thinking about Maddow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. A state that voted for Brown won't vote for Maddow
Harsh truths and all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. If she did, I'd desperately want to move to MA
just to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
21. She won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC