Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold: Statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:44 PM
Original message
Feingold: Statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC
1/21/2010 Contact: Zach Lowe (202) 224-8657

"It is important to note that the decision does not affect McCain-Feingold’s soft money ban, which will continue to prevent corporate contributions to the political parties from corrupting the political process.

But this decision was a terrible mistake. Presented with a relatively narrow legal issue, the Supreme Court chose to roll back laws that have limited the role of corporate money in federal elections since Teddy Roosevelt was president. Ignoring important principles of judicial restraint and respect for precedent, the Court has given corporate money a breathtaking new role in federal campaigns.

Just six years ago, the Court said that the prohibition on corporations and unions dipping into their treasuries to influence campaigns was ‘firmly embedded in our law.’ Yet this Court has just upended that prohibition, and a century's worth of campaign finance law designed to stem corruption in government.

The American people will pay dearly for this decision when, more than ever, their voices are drowned out by corporate spending in our federal elections. In the coming weeks, I will work with my colleagues to pass legislation restoring as many of the critical restraints on corporate control of our elections as possible."

http://wispolitics.com/index.Iml?Article=182723

:patriot: :kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
I wish him luck.

He's gonna need it. The SCOTUS ruling struck me as incredibly broad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I fear..
.. too little, too late. I hope I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. And of course the maverick John McCain is going to join with Russ again...
...NOT!

Never trust a Repuke, Russ!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought conservatives were against judicial activism
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 12:58 PM by andym
I guess they're against activism only when it is for the public good.
So much for the supreme court. Now we need a constitutional amendment taking away corporate personhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only suitable response is to start the long hard campaign to repeal corporate personhood
Passing law to "correct" this is ignoring the Elephant in the Room.

Civil Rights for PEOPLE ONLY.

Halliburton is not an American.
Goldman Sachs is not an American.
Blackwater is not an American.
Union Carbide is not an American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. You got that right. nt
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good for Russ. Question, do we know which judges voted how?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It went down exactly as one would expect 5-4
Kennedy being the only one on the majority side that was a bit surprising.

Stevens, Ginsburg, Sotomayer, and Breyer in the descent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. So much for the stare decisis that Roberts told us he respected
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 01:04 PM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
in his confirmation hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We knew he was lying. He's got serial liar written all over his face.
He's a nasty piece of work, make no mistake. And unlike Scalia he tries to look normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick!


:patriot: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC