Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inscribed over the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:36 PM
Original message
Inscribed over the Supreme Court



What does it say at the top of the Supreme Court Building? "Equal Justice Under Law"

I laughed when I read that when visiting DC last November with my "French" daughter.
Now, after today's decision, I am sad. Very sad.

It would seem that the Justices need to step outside the Court Building, take a look up and
read what is inscribed there. How can they possibly believe that "Equal Justice Under Law"
can be obtained, given the decision they made today?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, it can...
It just takes a lot more money than either of us has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe they could hire some workers to change the inscription to
Best Justice Money Can Buy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. Look how fast the unrecs add up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shameless bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for the recs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Share your sentiment k&r
Equal justice was already a fiction but now $ explicitly buys justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ugh, "birds not allowed"?
(my crude attempt at humor)

First, they came for the birds....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recommended/ Two set of laws in this country.
It's disgusting.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. "The Goldman Sachs Supreme Court Building"
Sponsorships and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL! They PAID for it.
Gee, come to think of it, Goldman Sachs owns all three branches of govmint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. You seem to be very confused.
You may disagree with the premise, but legal corporate personhood is a reality.

Today's SCOTUS decision simply gives corporate persons "Equal Justice Under Law" as it pertains to political campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I'm confused? I don't think so, and neither did four other justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. 5, however, did.
Whether you want to admit it or not, this is a sound legal interpretation of existing law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. At the other end of the Mall, in the Lincoln Memorial, where the words of the Gettysburg address
are inscribed, they could change "government of the people, by the people, for the people"
to "government of the corporation, by the corporation, for the corporation"

Lincoln must be rolling over in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC