|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:39 PM Original message |
Supporters of today's SCOTUS ruling owe this man a debt of gratitude: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Here we go again. But who confirmed Alito and Roberts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Republican Senates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Agreed, but but you are telling truth to the king Ralph supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. so he won more votes in Florida than black voters Kathryn Harris purged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tmyers09 (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. That's always just "conveniently" overlooked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Along with the 300,000 FL Dems who voted for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Or perhaps some of the un-reccers think this tired horseshit has long-since deserved retirement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ah the Two Minutes Hate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. That scapegoat turned into a corpse long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
36. Excatly and since we are pointing fingers what about Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. By what right does this guy think he can exercise free speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. Are you saying Gore/Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Supporters of today's SCOTUS ruling owe this man a debt of gratitude: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. No matter how you spin it, Nader lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeeDeep (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. He had plenty of warning about what could happen. . . but so did voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. True. Ralph had to have known the effect on SCOTUS if nothing else was a big enough difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. Or, thank Al Gore for not going after those votes and choosing Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dhpgetsit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
17. It isn't that simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. oh stuff a sock in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. It's been 10 years and you still haven't figured it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Did Nader not tell people there was little difference between Bush* and Gore? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Did Gore do almost nothing to disprove that statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. A lie's a lie and Nader told it. And I'm calling him out on it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. ... is a shit statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. So you feel that SCOTUS justices are insignificant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. ... is a shit statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Nader was an IRL troll and so were his supporters, only difference was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. ... is a shit statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Well, he lives and loves to share! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. Nader threads are so 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flaneur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
26. Not this tired and myopic shit again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
28. Odd. I don't remember the Democratic "leadership" raising a fucking finger to stop these justices' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
33. actually, Nader's been fighting "corporate personhood" since before you were born |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudbase (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-21-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
35. Gore couldn't even win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC