Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The last time the Supreme Court expanded was in 1869

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:03 PM
Original message
The last time the Supreme Court expanded was in 1869
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Size_of_the_Court

<snip>
The United States Constitution does not specify the size of the Supreme Court, but in Article III it authorizes the Congress to fix the number of justices. The Judiciary Act of 1789 called for the appointment of six justices. As the country grew geographically, Congress increased the number of justices to correspond with the growing number of judicial circuits: the court was expanded to seven members in 1807, nine in 1837 and ten in 1863.

At the request of Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase, Congress passed the Judicial Circuits Act (1866) which provided that the next three justices to retire would not be replaced; thus, the size of the Court should have eventually reached seven by attrition. Consequently, one seat was removed in 1866 and a second in 1867. However, this law did not play out to completion, for in the Judiciary Act of 1869,<73> also known as the Circuit Judges Act, the number of justices was again set at nine, where it has since remained.
<snip>


I think the United States has grown rather significantly since 1869. The size of both the Senate and the House has grown over the years. Does it really make sense that nine people should wield such a vast amount of power? In all honesty, over the past several years, we've seen that it can boil down to just one or two justices making such a huge impact.

We didn't have 50 states back in 1869. We sure as hell didn't have nearly 400 million people back then.

Maybe it is time to update the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting . . . let's go for it -- pack the court!!!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. FDR wanted to do this, but it failed
I don't think this is the route to go, it shouldn't even be attempted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. A number of posters are missing the fact that
Congress decides the number of Justices, not the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Exactly - and Congress has expanded the Supreme Court on several occasions
It's been expanded several times, although just not since 1869.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Expand it by one
The problem with the USSC is that theres no means to have a stalemate (short of illness, or abstaining) in the outcome with an uneven number of justices.

A ruling like the absurdity today wouldnt have been a ruling had there been one additional liberal justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Recommend. Yes, it's time.
A big increase. Double the size. Make it 18 justices and appoint 9 new ones. Make Scalia and gang a footnote. To end the excesses of the Drug War and of the spying on Americans, to end corporate personhood excesses, we have to stop this court now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. FDR couldn't do it, and that was with a massive Democratic majority in Congress
and fresh after his landslide in 1936.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought the FDR expanded the SCOTUS. I would like to see that
happen. 13 or 15 judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC