Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I know it was 5-4, but who?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:26 AM
Original message
I know it was 5-4, but who?

Which SC Justices voted how?

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. The 5 were the usual suspects
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 12:31 AM by kenny blankenship
Scalia Alito Roberts Thomas and Kennedy for corporate fascism.
Which leaves Breyer, Ginsberg, Stevens, and Sotomayor for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who do you think?
AYE: Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito
NAY: Sotomayor, Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Three guesses and the first two don't count.
Seriously, this vote was extremely predictable. Which justices are liberal and take the Constitution seriously, and which justices are right-wing assclowns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I know -SO-predictable, I could name them from memory
Republican nominated "justices" vs Democratic ones, with the exception of Stevens who was nominated by Gerald Ford but who is now the most liberal. (thanks a lot, Clinton)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. You've got it ALL wrong!
We're the ones with the activist judges, remember? Silly you.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Yup, when I heard the 5-4, I knew right away. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Vote roll call....
Supreme Court Judges who voted to give free hand to big corporation to purchase
the next elections, since they can't do anymore Bush vs. Gores are:

Justice Alito (nominated by Bush)
Justice Roberts (nominated by Bush)
Justice Thomas (nominated by Bush)
Justice Scalia (nominated by Reagan)
Justice Kennedy (nominated by Reagan)



Supreme Court Justices who voted AGAINST giving free hand to big corporation to purchase
the next elections:

Justice Sotomayor (nominated by Obama)
Justice Ginsburg (nominated by Clinton)
Justice Breyer (nominated by Clinton)
Justine Stevens (nominated by Ford before partisanship started running amok)



Still on the court and voted "for" Bush vs. Gore

Justice Thomas (nominated by Bush)
Justice Scalia (nominated by Reagan)
Justice Kennedy (nominated by Reagan)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. And here are the DINOs that voted for THOSE guys (from another thread):
Who voted for Roberts and Alito?

Democrats voting Yes:
Baucus (MT)

Bingaman (NM)

Byrd (WV)

Conrad (ND)

Dodd (CT)

Dorgan (ND)

Feingold (WI)

Johnson (SD)

Kohl (WI)

Landrieu (LA)

Leahy (VT)

Levin (MI)

Lieberman (CT)

Lincoln (AR)

Murray (WA)

Nelson, Ben (NE)

Nelson, Bill (FL)

Pryor (AR)

Rockefeller (WV)

Salazar (CO)

Wyden (OR)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Alito sworn in as nation's 110th Supreme Court justice

Senate confirms nominee 58-42 after filibuster fails

snip...

The four Democrats who broke party ranks and voted for Alito are Sens. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Kent Conrad of North Dakota. All four of the states represented by the senators were carried by Bush in both 2000 and 2004.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/alito/
"TERRORISM, 1. t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Felonious Five, Version 2.0 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. It is the normal RW v. LW split. For - Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas and (swing vote) Kennedy.
Against - Stevens, Ginsberg, Sotomyer, Breyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Gang of 5 remains in place though a couple of names have changed
Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, Alito, Roberts vs. Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Stevens, Breyer.

I found you a link but you don't even need an article to figure out how the current SCOTUS will vote on issues like this: http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20100121/ts_csm/275190_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. But I'm sure Obama will appoint the same type of SC Justices as GWB.
Since they're exactly the same and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. His first pick Sotomoyer was on the dissenting side of this
decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. I'm pretty sure that she/he was being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. If you seriously don't know whether Judge Sotomayer...
...is a man or a woman, then you don't have enough information to have an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I think Jesus-of-Suburbia was uncertain of Mayberry Machiavelli's gender...
not Sotomayor's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. You are probably right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. I"m gonna hold off on the "I told you sos." For now. But the first time
I see the "no difference' crowd, I'm all over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. I have tried so many times before to understand their position
I try, I really do try, to understand the perspectives of those I disagree with, because I know that oftentimes, there are reasonable explanations.

But I just cannot understand what these 5 traitors think. The only conclusion I can come to is that they are an alien life form of some kind, or their brains have been invaded by another life form (microbial even; doesn't have to be alien).

There's nothing more frustrating than trying but not being able to see the other perspective.

That said, does anyone here understand what they were thinking? I mean, aside from the obvious (greed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Have you though about power and overall corruption?

:shrug:

I mean that fits pretty well with their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Scum on a power-buzz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Sounds like something used to clean the bathtub
Perhaps apropos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fat Tony, Quiet Thomas, Sam the sham, Wiley Roberts and the Wrinkles Kennedy.

Also known as the Supremos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. The Unholy Quints, the Supreme Borg n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tell 'em Captain Renault...
"Round up the usual suspects."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Conservative "justices" subverting democracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Where's my winnings? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. The judicial system has been cheapened to where these momentous
decisions are made on a purely idealogical partisan political basis. Later on when some of these hacks are dead they'll
probably get a chance to overturn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. And don't forget Thomas doesn't think for himself, rarely
utters a word on the bench. He votes like his puppet master Alito tells him how to vote.

Sotomoyer has asked more questions in her short time on the bench than he has his entire carear on the Supreme Court. He has done exactly what daddy * wanted him to....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. The ones who should be, ahem, immediately retired the way Lyndon Johnson would have done it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
25. K-RATS
Kennedy, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia. (A good mnemonic device suggested by Shannyn Moore).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. The evil, disgusting gang of 5 proves without a doubt that we must always vote for the Dem
NO MATTER WHAT.
Throwing away your vote has consequences. I can be pissed at Obama all I want to be and still vote for him in 2012 because it is that important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Dems schmems -see post # 32 above...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC