Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arlen Specter: we need to consider a constitutional amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:31 AM
Original message
Arlen Specter: we need to consider a constitutional amendment
http://twitter.com/SenArlenSpecter/status/8044513088/

The decision affects the legitimacy of elections everywhere - we need to consider a Constitutional amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Finally a senator says it. Asshole McCain was on Blitzer last night saying nothing could be done
eventhough he disagreed with the supreme court. Fucking liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellad Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The pig likes his cesspool of corruption just fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. What differentiates Specter from McCain is brains and a law
degree. Of course McCain has no solutions, it's a miracle that idiot has been allowed to represent AZ for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Won't happen
Big Media will put an end to any ammendment. Comcast just bought NBC; looks like they knew a windfall of corporate advertisers was coming their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ok
never mind then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarPoint Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. How fast can this be accomplished?
I don't really know; some say years, some say a few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I have been waiting for Equal Rights Amemdment all my life
and my daughter is pushing 40. IOW: don't hold your breath.

We can't get Congress to pass easy stuff that might do some good. You think they are up to this? Or even want to? And then there are all the legislative bodies at state levels that would have to get 'er done.

Wonderful to dream, but America needs to wake up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let's push hard to revoke Corporate Personhood.


“I hope we shall... crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and to bid defiance to the laws of our country.” ~ Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Logan. November 12, 1816


Motion to Amend

We, the People of the United States of America, reject the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United, and move to amend our Constitution to:

* Firmly establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights.
* Guarantee the right to vote and to participate, and to have our vote and participation count.
* Protect local communities, their economies, and democracies against illegitimate "preemption" actions by global, national, and state governments.

http://www.movetoamend.org/motion-amend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. A bit late on the mark. But that is Specter's modus operandi, isn't it?
Takes a lot of 'elected' representatives 'of the people' to get a Constitutional amendment through. Not just 'elected' reps on the Hill, but in most state legislatures too. Since they all just became legal prostitutes, err, beneficiaries of generous corporate free speech, it seems unlikely enough of them would be honorable enough, brave enough, independent enough to actually be PUBLIC servants and real patriots.

The few who would dare to really work to fix this mess will be marketed against and made into laughing stocks because too many voters just don't do their homework. That last phrase is the reason we are now in this situation. We The People failed the republic. Dr. Franklin's droll comment all those decades ago was a prediction which came sadly true, as he likely knew it would, being a good observer of human nature and behavior.

Specter is just continuing his roll in the theater of bread and circus. He is doing bit parts now. His hay-day of important rolls was shortly after 1963.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Careful Arlen
You're starting to sound more like a Democrat. Now if you can actually do something to affect this change I might even be impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. What bullshit. He knows that CorpAmerica will never allow that. But it sounds so good.
Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. So let me get this straight; DUers oppose this idea because they hate the messenger?
and anyone here wonders why we don't accomplish much. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wrong logic. I love the message, I just dont believe the sincerity of the messenger.
Easy for him to spout the message. Let's see him do something about it. He is an asswipe republican that decided to screw up the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. oh fuck you arlen, you grandstanding asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I am with you on this cali. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. No more "considering"; JUST DO IT! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. HOLY CRAP! SPECTER!?!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC