Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Clarence Thomas the worst SC Justice in history?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:18 PM
Original message
Is Clarence Thomas the worst SC Justice in history?
Honestly, couldn't a good case be made Thomas may be the worst justice ever? What an embarrassment!

And he is 61 years old, the way things are going lately this sucker will probably be around for the next 20 years.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's certainly up there...
or down there, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. the chief justice (laney? taney?) during the dred scott decision was
so bad he was mocked by north and south, is the only chief justice without his bust in the courthouse, died in poverty while still on the court and is considered the worst of all time even then. I think this group ranks with them and for sheer mendacity and incompetence and hatred, thomas and scalia are the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. He and Scalia are neck-in-neck
But Roberts and Alito could very well take the title before its all said and done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. I think Scalia, Alito and Roberts actually are very knowledgeable
concerning the law. Like everyone here I disagree with their interpretation of it. As for Thomas he's an embarrassment to the SC. He may well be the least qualified person ever to sit on the bench, SC or any other court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Scalia's freakishly smart. Too bad he's on the wrong side. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Most sociopaths are very intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps not the very worst of all time, but certainly a contender. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Possibly the worst judge at any level of the judiciary.
You could pick 10 people at random off the street and probably at least 9 of them could do a better job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. Certainly worse than the judge in Pennsylvania who was sending kids to jail for bribes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes,Yes,Yes,and yes..
and he has the damn nerve to get an attitude if you ask him about an issue as though he doesn't have to answer for it because he has a lifetime job which should be changed in someway..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's certainly horrible.....but there have probably been Klansmen and all sorts of sociopaths.....
..... on the Court at some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And Thomas is different how exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Than a Klansman? ...... Thomas might be a troglodyte, but....
I don't think he belongs to a white supremacist group, unless you're counting the Supreme Court itself as one. :evilgrin:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well,
let's just say I'm not sure Thomas actually sees a black man when he looks in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Going way, way back, you've got Roger Taney
of Dred Scott fame, or infamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah, I'd put him at that level. Along with the rest of the dastardly five.
Bunch of fascist pigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Thomas would have voted for the majority in Dred Scot.
At some point he even signalled a willingness to reverse Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. + 1
As an aside, I'll never forgive Oliver Wendell Holmes for allowing state-mandated sterilization on citizens in Buck v. Bell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. it depends
If you are looking at him as a leader or a follower. The latter is more true to his standard.Besides he is a troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's an Insult to Trolls


Clarence is much more repulsive and vicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup the good die young
The evil live for fucking ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. No. Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney.
1834-1864.

Wrote the Majority opinion in the Dred Scott case in 1857:

It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in regard to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted; but the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far unfit that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.


In essence, Taney stated that African Americans are of an inferior species and have no rights under the constitution.

Yes, there is a town named after him in Maryland (where he is from). Taneytown where there are KKK activities to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Unlike Taney et al, Thomas is not only evil, he's STUPID
and thus even more unsuited for the judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Agreed...the George W. Bush of the SCOTUS...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I would hesitate calling Thomas the evil one. Stupid, yes. Though
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 02:17 PM by madinmaryland
I would define him as intellectually incurious.

I would consider Roberts to be the evil one, as all of the evidence points to him being on a mission to shepard through the court all of the requests the Corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You can argue that Thomas is no more than a rubber stamp for Roberts and Scalia,
but he is clearly serving the forces of evil, and that makes him evil himself in my estimation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Using that definition, you are corrrect. Interestingly, the scariest
of that bunch is Scalia, who I would say is a very sharp and intelligent man. I actually saw an oral argument about a year ago, and was surprised by both the pointed and well reasoned questions he asked and the humor that he injected into the hearing. It was even more interesting to watch two attorneys (who are definite liberals) argue a case with the conservative justices as their support.

I would define as "evil" both Roberts and Scalia. Alito and Thomas are more or less rubber stamps. As for Alito, when I was him, he and Roberts seemed to be following the same script, as if they had rehearsed together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightHawk63 Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. Pound for pound, I'd put this fool's evil up against ANYONE to ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
50. He's unqualified, but he is not stupid
He did very well in school, he's just not into this job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
55. Perfect n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
45. Taneytown had that name before Roger Taney was born
For what it's worth, Wikepedia says it was named after someone who shared a common ancestor.

But I do agree that Taney was probably the worst SC Chief Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. There have been others who were worse in the sense of doing more harm
E.g. Roger Taney and colleagues who made the infamous Dred Scott decision. Melville Fuller and colleagues who made the 'separate but equal' decision over Plessy vs. Ferguson. Even on the current Supreme Court, Scalia probably has more power in the wrong direction.

In my own country, we had the infamous hanging-and-flogging Lord Chief Justice Goddard in the 1950s (but at least he made *one* good decision in his career: that police should not have the right to demand ID cards). And of course if you go back to the 19th century and earlier, many of our judges were savage, and did everything in their power to crush dissidents of all sorts and 'uppity' working class people in particular.

Were there any *more incompetent* than Thomas? Very likely, but I can't think of any! What possessed Daddy Bush to nominate him?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. He was nominated because
Bush Sr. figured that the Democrats in the Senate, who had the majority, would not block an African American nominee, no matter how repugnant his ideology.

He was right of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. If I recall his nomination hearing, other than the sexual harrassment thing, there
was not much to discuss because he had done virtually nothing worth mentioning in his entire career.

I believe an original thought and a drink of cold water would kill him.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Yes - he's Scalia without the intellect. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. WOW! They must have to wheel him around on a refrigerator dolly....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. Not the worst, but the most INCOMPETENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Put me down for "Least Qualified".
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 02:59 PM by Hosnon
I think he was only a judge for a few years in a special federal court before being selected by Bush I. He is conservative and black - it was an easy move politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes
Without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParkieDem Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. No.
Roger Taney, Melville Fuller and Tom Clark were all much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Note to self: Read up on Taney, Fuller, & Clark. Discussion was useful. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightHawk63 Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Honestly, If this fool was on the court with Taney...
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 04:17 PM by NightHawk63
...he would have voted with the majority in the Dred Scott case. I have NO doubts about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. I propose a sting operation
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 03:26 PM by plcdude
on Clarence surely we catch him putting pubic hair on coke cans expose him and force his retirement. Obama appoints a replacement and we go back and straighten this out. Who wants to form a team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
35. Shoulda confirmed Anita Hill for the SC instead.
Send Clarence to sex addict rehab to help him get over his dependence on porn. He's dangerously stupid, but then anyone would seem bright to G HW Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why would he have to be THE "worst?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. After yesterday it is Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. In my mind, he's about as illegitimate as they come. He's the bush* butt boy....
...and certainly not the quality or caliber that should be sitting in the Chief Justice chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. Clarence the Perv the worst? I think he's running neck-and-neck with Fat Tony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffinEd Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
46. You mean Clarence who didn't hesitate to deal the race card...
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 04:46 PM by CoffinEd
when his confirmation was in jeopardy? High-tech lynching Clarence? Coke and a smile Clarence? That Clarence?

And to think he succeeded Thurgood Marshall on the court. Embarrassment is right!

To answer your question, on a scale of 1 to 10, Clarence is a damn -5341. And I'm in a good mood today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. He's tied with Roger Taney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. Opie Roberts is.
Thomas is a horrible bastard, but at least he was arguably qualified when he was appointed. Opie never was a judge at all until 2002, and even that was a a Chimpointment reward for his part in the Florida 2000 fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. yes
hands down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
53. The dude was almost done in with a
pubic hair. I think that sums up his character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
54. He has lots of company
he should never have been appointed. That 52-48 still annoys me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC