Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to argue Freepers that Supreme Court Ruling WRONG

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:25 AM
Original message
How to argue Freepers that Supreme Court Ruling WRONG
OK - Devils Advocate here................

"Why should we overturn the Supreme Court ruling - Corporations are America's Strength. They create jobs and produce Wealth for Americans. If this strengthens Corporate America - I say it is GOOD for the country"

Let them Fly DU

just try to remember I'm on the same side and I use spell checker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure what you're getting at here, but there is no "we" overturning a Supreme Court ruling
That's why it's called the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Court that determined "Personhood" for Corporations
has a HISTORY of their rulings being overturned

They ruled that the 14th Amendment did not apply to a "Woman's Right to Vote"

They also ruled the 14th Amendment did not grant "Blacks protection from Descrimination"

What we have in this decision is the culmenation of 2 seperate and equally corrupt Supreme Courts

So in answer to your question - not only can We overturn the original Supreme Court determination granting Corporations "Personhood" it is LONG Overdue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. "WE" did not overturn SC rulings - the SC did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The PEOPLE augued the case to overturn the rulings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. They are ONE of America's strengths,
PEOPLE are America's foundational strength. Furthermore, PEOPLE create jobs and PEOPLE produce wealth; Corps are a bunch of people, who are bound together to do some particular thing which may or may not be good for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. How about "How many Corps have sent Jobs to China?
"Since when has sending jobs to a Communist Country equated to America's Strength"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. The ruling applies to corporations NOT based in the US as well

Theoretically, Chinese corporations could advertise in American political campaigns.



Secondly.. and more importantly.... the Bill of Rights was written to enumerate the rights of INDIVIDUALS.... not of non-human entities.

The first amendment applies to all HUMAN CITIZENS... and cannot be extended to non-humans. The preamble of the Constitution says "We the People"....


People.


People are the only entities granted rights in the Constitution.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought everyday people; people working in farms, in factories, in offices, etc. were our strength
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 10:39 AM by ck4829
Guess I was wrong, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Most of those corporations are INTERNATIONAL. They don't want to be dependent on Mideast for oil,
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 10:45 AM by blm
and they don't want to be dependent on China for cashflow, but, that is exactly what their corporations have done for them. They will always be WalMart shoppers, because they were SET UP to always be WalMart shoppers.

THEY helped destroy little town Main Streets all over the country in favor of the WalMartization of this country. FASCISM. They helped GOP install fascism as the governing philosophy of this nation, all the while they believed they were protesting abortion and gay marriage used as a smokescreen to distract from the corporate agenda they really wanted to push through.

Democratic Republic is GONE and they helped the GOP kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. So this means "Foreigners can Influence our Elections?
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 10:47 AM by FreakinDJ
shudder shudder shudder..........

Mid-East Foriegners
French Monkeys
Communist from China..........

Work with me folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not just 'foreigners' but GLOBAL FASCISTS working with US FASCISTS. Seriously, what do you
THINK Poppy Bush and his brother were doing in China in the 70s when Jackson Stephens set up WalMart deal with Chinese financiers and industrialists?

WalMart was the first major test of the American PEOPLE and whether or not they would accept the tearing apart of their small towns and eventually their democratic republic, in favor of the 'international corporate domination of most every aspect of their lives' mindset aka Global Fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. So that includes the Communist Party of China
You know ALL those Chinese Corporations are owned and run by the Communist Government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Communist government has been an illusion. They have fascist leaders, financiers, and industrialists
hiding behind the communism flag to keep their nation in lockstep. No different than OUR fascist leaders, financiers, and industrialists who used the smokescreen issues (abortion, gays) of republican party to acquire the power they needed....and got....from this ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not me - now that corporations are people, I want to marry one
they got all the money.
I don't even care if the corporation is a male or female person. I live in Iowa where we have same sex marriage, so I can even marry a male corporation.
All I want is to taken care of by my darling corporation.
Not sure how we will consummate but but that's just a detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. I don't want to marry them
but I would like to fuck 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. LOL - Infidelity Merger
Can we have multiple Corporate Mergers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Go for the xenophobic angle maybe. Corporations with foreign ownership
could be free to use as much of their cash as they want to on political campaigning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Corporations are the "ones" who are paying their employees as little as possible
and as few benefits as possible. What they want their politicians to vote for is for as few regulations as possible and their unfettered right to make the biggest profit possible. Corps have no conscience at all, if I pay you pennies and you can't afford to live or get medical care, that is YOUR problem. They want what is good for them, they don't care about anybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Corporations like the ones who caused the GREAT DEPRESSION
of 1929 and 2008

The Corporations that reduced the value of your home 60%, and took $1Trillion Dollars of Tax Payer Money to Bailout

YOU MEAN THOSE CORPORATIONS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. You know this will have Rush LimpDick working overtime
in his "Pro-Corp" spew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. So that would include those great patriots
at Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup and AIG. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Worthy of Protecting no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TCJ70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Corporations have no incentives for creating jobs without regulation...
...reinstate higher taxes on insane incomes with language that would encourage money be reinvested in business and employees and then you'll probably see higher wages and more jobs. How can a corporation create more jobs if all its money is going to executives and stockholders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I saw the committee on CSPIN last night discussing exactly that
The usual RATpubliCON tools were attempting to spew their Failed Policies, but I have to admit the DEMs were making Strong Arguments in favor of limiting compensation and using Taxation as a means to fuel more sound policy and investment.

The DEMs successfully equated the lax regulatory policies and burdening Corp pay as being the leading causes of the Failure of the Monetary system as in the current economic crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC