Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tough Morning for Justice Stevens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:31 AM
Original message
Tough Morning for Justice Stevens

"His words about the changed court reminded spectators not only of a passing era in campaign finance law but of all that Stevens had witnessed over his nearly 35 years on the bench..." (US Today).


It's rare, and always dramatic to watch, when a Supreme Court justice reads from a dissent on the bench. On Thursday, when Justice John Paul Stevens read at length from his stinging 90-page dissent in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, it was also a little painful to watch.

For more than 20 minutes, Stevens spoke haltingly as he read from a summary of the dissent, a task he'd ordinarily breeze through. The 89-year-old justice seemed off his game, tripping on some words, getting stuck on others. At one point, he kept mispronouncing the word "corporation" as something like "corpo-russian," and he could not quite get it right.

As CBS News Court correspondent Jan Crawford noted on her blog with similar observations, "Maybe it was just a bad day, and Lord knows we’ve all had those." And the written product is more important than how it was read aloud. But with a justice who is said to be on the verge of retiring at the end of this term, and in a case of such high impact, it was hard not to notice Stevens' tough morning.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/01/tough-morning-for-justice-stevens.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. It cannot be easy, holding up against all these conservative
Justices...

Esp. at his age.

I admire his courage.

And his steadfastness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good staywithitness for sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. he and ruth are staying with illness and disappointment because they
love this country. they should be home enjoying the remaining years of their lives but they are there for us and I love them. Bless him. He reminds me of my Papa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Damn.
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 01:48 AM by elleng
'Better,' tho:

Meanwhile, a loud banging noise from the bench all but drowned him out. That's true. But Justice Anthony Kennedy fared no better reading from his majority opinion beforehand, tearing through the first part of his summary, then losing his place and stumbling through the holding. If Citizens United really represents the moment at which the Roberts court allows itself to finally give voice to its full-throated judicial activism, it's not clear Anthony Kennedy managed much more than a vocal mumble. He looked like he'd have preferred to have been reading his dissent from a soapbox. Or maybe from a crouch underneath the bench. Stevens haltingly worked his way through all five of his objections to the majority's holding today. Kennedy barely gulped out the holding itself. . .

Even former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist once warned that treating corporate spending as the First Amendment equivalent of individual free speech is "to confuse metaphor with reality." Today that metaphor won a very real victory at the Supreme Court. And as a consequence some very real corporations are feeling very, very good.


http://www.slate.com/id/2242208/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You can say that again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm afraid I will, but check my 'edit,'
and then lets look at Kennedy's age. Replace both, maybe? (I shouldn't say such, I know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Why say such a thing?
They can't be "replaced" unless they retire or die. So why waste your energy saying replace them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Doesn't take much energy for me to 'say' such.
Sorry if its too much for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Real American hero right there.
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 01:48 AM by Truth2Tell
:patriot:

Edit to add: Really great video interview of Justice Stevens with Brian Lamb of C-SPAN doing a tour of his office and talking about his career:

http://supremecourt.c-span.org/Video/JusticeOwnWords/SC_Jus_Stevens.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. 89 And Off His Game
Imagine that....
Reading a 90 page document and messing up once in a while at the age of 89.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. not only that,
a stinging, brilliant and historic 90 page document which he himself wrote. at 89. But he mis-pronounced corporation, so he must be losing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. What makes you think he wrote it?
Law clerks write the draft opinions and the Justices tweak them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Watch the video in my post #6.
Unlike the other Justices, Stevens writes the first draft of all of his own opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I hope I'm as much on my game at 89
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. What a wonderful photo
the lighting is great. Bless his heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. If he passes, then Obama better put a REAL liberal in his seat.
Putting anyone to the right of Stevens in that chair would be as deadly as giving it to Robert Bork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I hope you don't have any money riding on Obama doing the right thing
for anybody but his corporate constituency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. yeah, the corpocrats love Sonia Sotomayor
and it's not only Sotomayor. His appointments to the federal bench DO inspire confidence. I have plenty of criticisms of Obama from healthcare reform to Afghanistan. His judicial appointments are not an area where he deserves criticism.

but then you actually have to be a wee bit informed and fair minded to know that, dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. that was before he sold his soul or
whatever audacious organ big pharma now has in it's vice, along w/ whatever big ag has control of that goes along nicely w/ with the organ that the finance industry has. I'm fair minded cali, dear. I also have my eyes wide open.

Or do you wanna try and peddle me a dog turd in a bottle and call it perfume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Never said I did.
Just said he'd better if he cares about this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Good luck getting him or her confirmed by this senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. He must have been very angry, very upset with the majority opinion.
I wonder what O'Connor is thinking now. She could have stayed on the Court just a little longer.

The Republican Party is no longer the party that she used to belong to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'd be tripping over those particular words, too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bless Him
We will not see his like again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. he is a good man.
Unfortunately, I don't think he will be around much longer. God bless him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC