Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Harry Reid need to go NOW? Who can lead the Senate in a populist direction? Unfortunately, Byron Dorgan (D-ND),

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:15 PM
Original message
Does Harry Reid need to go NOW? Who can lead the Senate in a populist direction? Unfortunately, By...
Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who would be an ideal POPULIST Majority Leader and has sought leadership positions unsuccessfully in the past, already has announced he'll retire this year--because a popular Republican governor would run against him in his solidly Red state.

Are there any Democratic Senators from Blue states that could be as populist as Dorgan, who in 1999 eerily predicted that bank deregulation he and just eight other Senators voted against would ultimately lead to deep recession and huge federal government bailouts?

Does any other Senator have the kinds of credentials listed below?

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Byron_L._Dorgan :

During his 17-year Senate tenure, the Democrat has remained popular in North Dakota by demanding that the government strengthen trade and banking laws to protect consumers. A staunch advocate of fiscal responsibility, Dorgan has lobbied against free trade and deregulation. Dorgan has been a vocal opponent of deregulation, and has often opposed measures that offer less oversight for financial markets. Dorgan voted against former President Bill Clintons 1999 Bank Deregulation Act along with only eight Senators. At the time, he said that deregulation would lead to a Great Depression-like crisis, a claim that now seems prescient.Altaffer, Mary, "Washingtons Invisible Hand," New York Times, Sept. 26, 2008 He also voted against the $700 billion economic bailout bill because he said there were not enough watchdogs in place to prevent a repeat of the economic meltdown. ... He has since requested a GAO study into the use of foreign tax shelters by banks who received a bailout.
(Leonnig, Carol, "Bailed-Out Firms Have Tax Havens, GAO Finds," Washington Post, Jan. 17, 2008)

In 2004, Dorgan was named the co-chair of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee. Though he had hoped for a more plum assignment, Dorgan threw himself into the position. Unhappy with Senate GOPers weak oversight of the executive branch, he called for a series of hearings to expose corruption in the post-Hurricane Katrina clean-up and use of contractors in Iraq. When the Democrats regained the majority in 2006, Dorgan worked with other leaders to set a new agenda. He pushed to ban all products made in sweatshops, to allow low-cost prescription drugs to enter the U.S. from Canada, and to re-open trade with Cuba, a big potential importer of North Dakota grain. ...

Dorgan has long hoped to break into the upper-echelons of Democratic leadership, but so far hasnt succeeded. In 1998, he considered a run for Minority Whip, but backed down when he realized Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had the votes. He tried again in 2004, but was defeated by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), in part because the Democratic leadership wanted someone who hailed from a blue state. Despite these setbacks, Dorgan made the most of his appointment as Policy Committee chairman. He has used his position to investigate the executive branch, which he said Senate Republicans were afraid to do. Though Dorgan has no subpoena power, his efforts prompted investigations into the governments work in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina and whether Halliburton had been offered illegal contracts in Iraq. ...

He ran for an open Senate seat in 1992, and was re-elected in 1998 with 63 percent of the vote. In the 2004 race, Republican Mike Liffrig ran harsh attack ads against Dorgan. In one, pairs of women and men embraced at an altar in a reference to gay marriage. The narrator said you can kiss our North Dakota values goodbye, or you can kiss Senator Dorgan goodbye. But Dorgan defeated Liffrig soundly, winning 68 percent of the vote. ... Dorgan was born in Regent, a town of 250 people, and graduated from a high school class of just nine students. He went on to the University of North Dakota and ... business school at the University of Denver. At 26, he was appointed to Deputy State Tax Commissioner, which made him the youngest constitutional officer in North Dakotas history. He ran for State Tax commissioner in 1969, and held the position until 1980, when he won a seat in the House. ... He jumped to the Senate in 1992, and has won reelection twice. But the Democrat's grasp on
the seat could have been weakened by a possible challenge from popular Gov. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) in 2010. ... Giving Republicans a chance at the seat, Dorgan announced on Jan. 5, 2010, that he wouldn't seek reelection ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. You get an A for effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thanks. But how come the recommendation count for this thread is NEGATIVE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Obviously, you misunderstood the message...
or the meaning of the image...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. In reality, how do you propose to make Harry Reid go "now"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Senate Democratic Caucus must be regrouping after the loss of Teddy
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 07:28 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
Kennedy's seat to the Republicans. They could vote him out if they were worried enough about Democratic election prospects a little more than 9 months from now, couldn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Ousting Reid now might grease the skids for him in November.
We need him in the Senate. If Reid loses in November, it is a moot point. If he wins, it is probably his last 6-year term. Give him a choice committee chair and oust him before Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That might be one of the tradeoffs to consider.
But if things keep on going the way they have for the past year, Reid well could lose anyway, along with many other Senators and even more Representatives.

Reid has to bear a lot of the responsibility for allowing "bipartansinship" toward Republicans to delay action on important legislation. Then the Rs filibustered the packages anyway!

Replacing him with someone stronger AFTER November surely would be too late, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. i've seen this asked about a zillion times here at DU
literally a zillion times.

People come up with a list of senators they like. Boxer, Harkin, Sanders, etc.

But never once have I seen anyone say that they called their senator and asked him or her to challenge Reid, or express dissatisfaction with Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Who in the past has actually tried unsuccessfully to get into the Senate leadership?
Unless a Senator has longstanding leadership aspirations, it would be difficult for him or her to replace Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I nominate Barbara Boxer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Or Russ Feingold...
Bernie Sanders would be a choice too, but Dems wouldn't let him do that when only caucusing with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. My dream ny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Replace one DLC member with another?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. WH Populism--Did you know that Press Secy Robt Gibbs was spokesman for former populist Senator
Ernest "Fritz" Hollings (D-SC) in his last reelection campaign, in 1998?

See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7558740 .

Maybe the White House will inspire some Senators to follow the economic populist examples of Dorgan and his less coherent colleague Hollings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Of course he is a freshman and certainly not eligible
but I'll be darn if Al Franken isn't the kind of guy we need in charge. I will say Kerry is putting his foot down lately and he can work with people he would be pretty good. The thing is, all the good ones are freshman like Sherrod Brown or Sheldon Whitehouse. It doesn't leave too many senators with guts. Except for Feingold or Durbin who's there. Mikowski from Maryland is feisty but she doesn't know how to get people motivated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Russ Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC