Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tell Rupert Murdoch's WSJ what you think of the fascist takeover by SCOTUS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:37 PM
Original message
Tell Rupert Murdoch's WSJ what you think of the fascist takeover by SCOTUS!

http://online.wsj.com/community/groups/question-day-229/topics/do-you-agree-supreme-courts

Currently showing:

Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down limits on corporate political spending?

NO - 74.2% (512 votes)
YES - 25.8% (178 votes)

------------------

DU! Go ahead and hammer this poll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done and some great comments further down...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down limits on corporate political spending?


yes--- 178

no---- 516
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are we supposed to say YES or NO?
The question is really confusing. Hurts my brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No is the answer, corporations should be limited if not prohibited from contributing...
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 07:52 PM by cascadiance
They are NOT people and shouldn't be allowed to influence voting as "persons". The constitution doesn't give them rights to free speech, despite the justices claiming they do have these rights who also claim to be "constitutional constructionists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. NO it is then.
Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. done and commented...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well Stated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Done
74.9% no
25.1% yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC