Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Insurance's Latest Bid to Screw Over Hospitals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:26 PM
Original message
Big Insurance's Latest Bid to Screw Over Hospitals
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 12:28 PM by PHIMG
(source New York Times - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/health/policy/25insure.html?ref=health&pagewanted=all)


A front in the national health care battle has opened in New York City, where a major hospital chain and one of the nation’s largest insurance companies are locked in a struggle over control of treatment and costs that could have broad ramifications for millions of people with private health insurance.

The fight is between Continuum Health Partners, a consortium of five New York hospitals, including Beth Israel Medical Center and St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, both major teaching hospitals, and UnitedHealthcare.

The prestigious hospitals and the major health insurer have been in bitter contract negotiations, not just over rates but also over UnitedHealthcare’s demand that the hospitals notify the insurance company within 24 hours after a patient’s admission. If a hospital failed to do so, UnitedHealthcare would cut its reimbursements for the patient by half.

UnitedHealthcare says the proposed rule is meant to improve the quality of care and cut costs by allowing insurance case managers to jump in right away. The hospitals say that having their reimbursement cut in half is too much to pay for a clerical error, and that the revenue drain would ultimately hurt their patients.

The dispute signals a “ratcheting up” of a long tradition of insurers trying to cut costs, said Jeffrey Rubin, an economics professor at Rutgers University.

-----
OP's commentary:

Hospitals provide value - they employ doctors that heal people.

Insurers do not provide value - they are needless middlemen who add only unnecessary costs, complexity, heartache and trauma.

Private Health Insurance Must Go!

Medicare can do what Big Insurers do for 3% of spending instead of 30%. If we eliminate the Private Insurers from the provision of medically necessary care (by moving to Medicare For All)... we can save hundreds of billions of dollars every year, enough to give everyone insurance without spending more than we do today.

PRIVATE HEALTH INSURERS SELL AN OVERPRICED DEFECTIVE PRODUCT. Providers hate private insurers and anyone who has had to use thier insurers hates private insurers too.

WALL STREET says we have to put up with it. It's the American way. But we have an alternative in place today. MEDICARE - If it's good enough for grandma, it's good enough for EVERYONE.

DECLARE that you are a MEDICARE FOR ALL DEMOCRAT. No more DLC-style "reform". Demand REAL REFORM TODAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Parasites. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. It happened here in Fla with my insurance co and hospitals where i live
last December..

I got a letter from my local Hospital which is part of a group of all Hospitals where i live..the letter said that i could not use this hospital because they could not get any co-operation with Aetna..they told me to contact my insurance group and raise a complaint..

Good thing i didn't have to be on Chemo or heart care or anything like that..because if i did need them ..they are a chain of hospitals here..owned by the same conglomerate..and i would have had no where to go!

Oh and i pay $2,500.00 a month to Aetna!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. UHC will readily use that technicality to deny paying benefits
Just as they use all sorts of methods to cancel costly policies, even entire small group plans, to avoid continuing coverage for expensive conditions.

Widely documented. This is their version of sticking it to the hospital and to the patient/client(?!).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC