Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Max Baucus on debt commission legislation: "commission is a Social Security-cutting machine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:04 PM
Original message
Senator Max Baucus on debt commission legislation: "commission is a Social Security-cutting machine


President Plans Own Panel on the Debt
By JACKIE CALMES
January 26, 2010

WASHINGTON — Advocates of more aggressive steps to address the national debt failed Tuesday in their effort to create a bipartisan commission to press for tax increases and spending cuts, but President Obama now plans to establish a similar panel by executive order in his State of the Union address on Wednesday.

The alternative panel to be established by Mr. Obama will also come up with recommendations by December to reduce annual budget deficits and slow or reverse the growth of the national debt. But unlike the commission proposal killed by the Senate, Mr. Obama’s executive order could not force Congress to vote on a commission’s suggestions.

The proposal, co-sponsored by Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota, the chairman of the Budget Committee, and Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, the committee’s senior Republican, called for an 18-member commission — eight lawmakers from each party and two administration officials — to draft a package that Congress would have to vote on in December without amending it.

One of the most vocal opponents was Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. He said the bill’s sponsors had “painted a big red bull’s-eye on Social Security,” adding, “Their commission is a Social Security-cutting machine.”

Read the full article at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/politics/27budget.html






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh it's ON Baucus you piece of shit!
Pitchforks at the ready! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't understand your post. Are you attacking his comment and if so why?

I think in this case he spoke the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You want Social Security and Medicare cut? Baucus was defending them against the
'commission'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Baucus is absolutely correct.
They need to leave SS and Medicare alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah, it appears on this issue, Baucus is on our side.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. probably, just lip service. i don't believe a word that comes out of his mouth.

Baucus is an ultimate corporate whore.

(But then again, maybe he does have some remnants of moral consciousness left in him, or he wouldn't have said that... What do you know... :shrug: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I finally agree with Baucus on something.
That "Commission", was like the mob commission. They were putting a hit on Social Security.
Conrad and Gregg, along with their sponsor, Pete Peterson are scum.

And why was Obama supporting this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC