|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:05 PM Original message |
O'Keefe supporters: intent was to show that citizens can't get through to Landrieu's office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. not buying it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. looks like the talking point/meme has been formed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. It is a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. they've been trying out a few. None of them make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. And neither is any other intelligent being on the whole planet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Riiiiiight. Videotaping themselves making phone calls would not do the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. We shall guarantee Landrieu's accountability - by compromising her security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bull |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. What a pile of horseshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. what a bunch of sleazoids. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. I think it's more important that SPIES can't get into a Senator's office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. And, why, exactly, did they have to get into the phone closet? - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Like a bloody Monty Python sketch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
11. And the lawyer that brings that defense before a judge will get laughed out of the courtroom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. I hope it is James Bopp Jr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. WHO GIVES A FUCK? They don't get to make excuses for BREAKING THE LAW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renegade000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. what so they're pretending like they're actually repairmen now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. Who cares? Just throw the freak in prison already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I do! The very least these "supporters" can do is to think up something funnier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. Erm... I don't believe that is a valid reason for breaking the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. I was just trying to return these drugs to their rightful owner, officer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. LOL! Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:19 PM Original message |
As the old folks always said, "A poor excuse is better than none". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. It doesn't matter WTF they were trying to prove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. Liars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. not if you show up posing as the phone man with no credentials....throw the book at them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theothersnippywshrub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
25. O'Keefe could have videotaped the receptionist's phone while another teabugger called from just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. Heresay. BS. I object! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
29. LMFAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
30. Ha ha ha, what a lame pile-o-crap excuse that is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
32. Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. So, their excuse is that they were going to sabotage the Senator's official govt phone lines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
34. Of course--and this is what a DC pimp looks like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
35. Liar, liar, pants on fire! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
36. Is that this hour's excuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
38. Then why not do a survey, call her and see what happens, etc.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
39. Then why would the assholes need access to the telephone closet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
40. hahahahahahahahahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
41. So basically, they've said they intended to eavesdrop phone conversations to a US Senator's office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
42. It doesn't matter what they intended, they broke the law big-time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BarbaRosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. (Cue Jon Lovitz voice) Yeah, that's the ticket, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC