|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:08 PM Original message |
The Best comment of the SOTU: Obama looked straight at SCJ Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hope he didn't look directly into Roberts alien laser bolt eyes!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Those laser bolt eyes, really looked more like a night light in a bathroom after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. good. they usually look like pools of toxic nooklear waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. that's nookulear ... jeeze can't you pronunciate rite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. LOL oooops!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. It's safe unless the left eye starts twitching. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I think Scalia controls that eye twitch switch on Roberts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. That absolutely gave me a bit of hope. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Those bastids needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatesthegop (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes I loved it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. He spoke truth to power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Obama to SCROTUS, "Take that!". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. The problem is even more serious than thought before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, and Scalito and Thomas weren't available?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. He gave the bastards a good scolding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
12. He could have supported a filibuster of Roberts and of Alito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. He voted against both of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Since we didn't have a majority at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. So votes only count when one is in the majority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. If you don't have the votes to win then that is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
19. Roberts' Eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. GAH! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. WTF!! Is that Roberts or Boner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. He's on anti-seizure medication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. Roberts has been complaining about the inadequate pay for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. didn't he have the cherries to actually ask for a PER DIEM? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ratty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
28. I wish he had specifically mentioned "stare decisis" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merkins (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
30. Roberts really does look Psycho underneath that mask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC