Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was a military person doing in uniform clapping for the Republican 'rebuttal'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:47 AM
Original message
What was a military person doing in uniform clapping for the Republican 'rebuttal'?
I thought service men and women were supposed to be scrupulously apolitical when in uniform.
Also, what a load of horsewaste.


On the bright side, I thought our President hit it out of the park.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember, leadership at the Pentagram has not changed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Commander AWOL (R) purged the Pentagon and installed his own so called leaders
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 04:24 AM by SpiralHawk
Most people forget the chickenhawk republicon purges...and all the FAIL that has followed...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. There was somebody in the First Lady's Box doing the same thing
So it can go both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Didn't see that, but there's no rule against people being in uniform clapping for the President;
it's the partisan part that's not within bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. The SOTU is partisan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. But that was about military & military family benefits.
That's a little bit different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. No it can't
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 08:43 AM by Toots
The President is the Commander in Chief. He is the Military's boss. They have to by Military Law be present when asked and be in uniform. It is also against Military Law to be in uniform when attending any Political function. The military that was present at the SOU was not there to support the Democrats but the nation. The Military at the Republican assembly were there to support Republicans, and in Uniform and that is not allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Maybe it was the Virgina National Guard?
They work for the governor and not the president unless federalized.

The President of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the state militias "when called into the actual Service of the United States". (Article II, Section 2).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. If the Governor was giving the State of the State then maybe, but he was not
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 09:15 AM by Toots
This was a purely partisan event and that soldier should be reprimanded and possibly court martialed. When in uniform he represent the US Military and not himself. It is very plainly against Military Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The National Guard does not represent the US Military
One is controlled by the state, the other by the US Department of Defense. Please show me where this is plainly against military law.

Oh by the way, it's court martial, not marshal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. The National Guard is governed by UCMJ
It follows exactly the same Laws as the regular Military..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. You need to do a little more research since clearly you don't have a clue
about the differences between title 10 and title 32.

Good luck with your outrage.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Sorry, you are just wrong about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Thanks.
Rules is rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. The Governor in Virginia is not Commander in Chief.
The guy in the First Lady's box was applauding his Commander in Chief. The guy in the rebuttal was applauding a guy who was criticizing his Commander in Chief. See? It doesn't work both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. How do you know the guy wasnt VA National Guard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Some military folks are Republican.
Some aren't.

Me? Don't really care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, that's true, but they aren't supposed to be visibly partisan in uniform.
I am quite sure of that. I have no problem with whatever political affiliation but not in uniform.

If we have to honor the rules, they should too. (Them= republicans).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. eh... not so much. they are required to follow orders. but if they express an opinion at a speach?
who fucking cares if they applaud or not?

really...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. I hear what you're saying...
But it's one thing to be present and applauding at the SOTU Address or to be in the audience and applauding (albiet politely) if the POTUS or a Member of Congress is making an official visit to your base.

But this was a POLITICAL rally. This is the partisan, Republican response to the President's speech and the guest list was by invitation only.

He was put there as a prop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. I do...really
That uniform represents the US Military and not the person wearing it. I do not want the US Military being partisan..It is against the Law and quite frankly it is very frightening..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. the rules:
Can - Attend partisan and nonpartisan political meetings or rallies as a spectator when not in uniform.

Cannot - Attend partisan political events as an official representative of the Armed Forces.

Cannot - Participate in partisan political management, campaigns, or conventions (except as a spectator when not in uniform), or make public speeches in the course thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. clapping = making public speeches? really? why do you care so much about this? it is nothing...
let it go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. it's important because like it or not people are influenced by little
seemingly innocent gestures like that.

I noticed it myself right away- and my first gut reaction was (oh shit) because many of the shots of the President's audience at the SOU showed the Joint Chiefs sitting still while most Dems were applauding. (same with the SC). That simple gesture sends a message. It's one thing to see ALL Military reps being unresponsive, but to show an admittedly PARTISAN 'response' with a uniformed Military Rep in hearty agreement is wrong. It would have been under Bush- and I'm sure there would have been repercussions for the person involved-

imo anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. I care because we cared enough to take off the uniform when at political events,
and they should too. When the Commander in Chief goes on base and speaks to the troops, that is not a political event, or it shouldn't be. But the republican rebuttal was.

I don't understand why you take such exception. It's not like I'm calling for a walkout or a letter to the editor campaign, just noting the fact on a bulletin board. Do you suggest silence?

If so, what is the purpose of this or any other board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Sounds like everyone followed the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I never saw that
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. applauding doesn't necessarily mean approval
or should be taken as a sign of partisanship. Generally applause is often nothing more than a sign of respect and politeness... nothing more than a courtesy. If you think his applauding is a sign of partisanship, his NOT applauding would also be a sign of partisanship. If others were applauding it would be courteous to also applaud.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. VA National Guard
I could see that he was enlisted but I couldn't make out the chevrons. If that was the sergeant major of the VA National Guard, I think the governor appoints him so it would make sense for him to keep the guv happy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. remember there was someone advising the troops that they show no reaction
to Obama's speech at a base a while back ... which apparently was the norm under all Presidents ...

but then, the "liberal media" didn't make a huge stink about the troops "not applauding" or "not reacting" under Bush43 ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC