Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Pelosi Says Budget Freeze Should Include Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:49 PM
Original message
Rep. Pelosi Says Budget Freeze Should Include Defense
WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) made a public call Thursday for defense spending to be included in President Barack Obama's proposed budget freeze, suggesting that defense contracting funds should also be part of the austerity effort.

Ms. Pelosi, in her weekly news conference, praised Mr. Obama's proposal to freeze discretionary federal spending, but called into question his exemption of defense spending from the proposal. She suggested that defense spending could be frozen without adversely affecting troops.

"I don't think that we have to protect military contractors, and I want to make that distinction very clearly," Ms. Pelosi said. "I do not think the entire defense budget should be exempted."

She referred to a "bifurcation" between contracting funds and troop funding, saying that "we all want to support our men and women in uniform, and I don't think they should be subject to this."


read: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704878904575031372411810274.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended.
About time. Thank you Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's a start
i would have out my meat cleaver if i was the one at 1600 penn. ave. but at least applying this gimmick to defense contractors is a step in the right direction.
go nancy, and go the progressive caucus, which i think is getting in her face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R, absolutely agreed-- we should cut the MIC budget by 67 percent...
...AT LEAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you, Nancy. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_Lawyer09 Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about this
Unblack the CIA budget and the 25% of the DOD budget that is blacked, for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're at the wrong website, djsteinb
But you got all the way up to one post. Congratulations.

Back to the original topic: Yes, I could see a freeze on defense spending. After all, I'm sure all those patriotic contractors would eagerly cut their profit margin so the U.S. of A. could regain some of its former glory. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC