Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin's "response" to the State of the Union... who wants to bet her ghost writer penned it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:33 PM
Original message
Palin's "response" to the State of the Union... who wants to bet her ghost writer penned it
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/note.php?note_id=271836568434&comments

The commentary in response is frankly frightening. The dumbing down of America is evident!

While I don’t wish to speak too harshly about President Obama’s state of the union address, we live in challenging times that call for candor. I call them as I see them, and I hope my frank assessment will be taken as an honest effort to move this conversation forward.

Last night, the president spoke of the “credibility gap” between the public’s expectations of their leaders and what those leaders actually deliver. “Credibility gap” is a good way to describe the chasm between rhetoric and reality in the president’s address. The contradictions seemed endless.

He called for Democrats and Republicans to “work through our differences,” but last year he dismissed any notion of bipartisanship when he smugly told Republicans, “I won.”

He talked like a Washington “outsider,” but he runs Washington! He’s had everything any president could ask for – an overwhelming majority in Congress and a fawning press corps that feels tingles every time he speaks. There was nothing preventing him from pursuing “common sense” solutions all along. He didn’t pursue them because they weren’t his priorities, and he spent his speech blaming Republicans for the problems caused by his own policies.

He dared us to “let him know” if we have a better health care plan, but he refused to allow Republicans in on the negotiations or consider any ideas for real free market and patient-centered reforms. We’ve been “letting him know” our ideas for months from the town halls to the tea parties, but he isn’t interested in listening. Instead he keeps making the nonsensical claim that his massive trillion-dollar health care bill won’t increase the deficit.

Americans are suffering from job losses and lower wages, yet the president practically demanded applause when he mentioned tax cuts, as if allowing people to keep more of their own hard-earned money is an act of noblesse oblige. He claims that he cut taxes, but I must have missed that. I see his policies as paving the way for massive tax increases and inflation, which is the “hidden tax” that most hurts the poor and the elderly living on fixed incomes.

He condemned lobbyists, but his White House is filled with former lobbyists, and this has been a banner year for K Street with his stimulus bill, aka the Lobbyist’s Full Employment Act. He talked about a “deficit of trust” and the need to “do our work in the open,” but he chased away the C-SPAN cameras and cut deals with insurance industry lobbyists behind closed doors.

He spoke of doing what’s best for the next generation and not leaving our children with a “mountain of debt,” but under his watch this year, government spending is up by 22%, and his budget will triple our national debt.

He spoke of a spending freeze, but doesn’t he realize that each new program he’s proposing comes with a new price tag? A spending freeze is a nice idea, but it doesn’t address the root cause of the problem. We need a comprehensive examination of the role of government spending. The president’s deficit commission is little more than a bipartisan tax hike committee, lending political cover to raise taxes without seriously addressing the problem of spending.

He condemned bailouts, but he voted for them and then expanded and extended them. He praised the House’s financial reform bill, but where was Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in that bill? He still hasn’t told us when we’ll be getting out of the auto and the mortgage industries. He praised small businesses, but he’s spent the past year as a friend to big corporations and their lobbyists, who always find a way to make government regulations work in their favor at the expense of their mom & pop competitors.

He praised the effectiveness of his stimulus bill, but then he called for another one – this time cleverly renamed a “jobs bill.” The first stimulus was sold to us as a jobs bill that would keep unemployment under 8%. We now have double digit unemployment with no end in sight. Why should we trust this new “jobs bill”?

He talked about “making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development,” but apparently it’s still too tough for his Interior Secretary to move ahead with Virginia’s offshore oil and gas leases. If they’re dragging their feet on leases, how long will it take them to build “safe, clean nuclear power plants”? Meanwhile, he continued to emphasize “green jobs,” which require massive government subsidies for inefficient technologies that can’t survive on their own in the real world of the free market.

He spoke of supporting young girls in Afghanistan who want to go to school and young women in Iran who courageously protest in the streets, but where were his words of encouragement to the young girls of Afghanistan in his West Point speech? And where was his support for the young women of Iran when they were being gunned down in the streets of Tehran?

Despite speaking for over an hour, the president only spent 10% of his speech on foreign policy, and he left us with many unanswered questions. Does he still think trying the 9/11 terrorists in New York is a good idea? Does he still think closing Gitmo is a good idea? Does he still believe in Mirandizing terrorists after the Christmas bomber fiasco? Does he believe we’re in a war against terrorists, or does he think this is just a global crime spree? Does he understand that the first priority of our government is to keep our country safe?

In his address last night, the president once again revealed that there’s a fundamental disconnect between what the American people expect from their government, and what he wants to deliver. He’s still proposing failed top-down big government solutions to our problems. Instead of smaller, smarter government, he’s taken a government that was already too big and supersized it.

Real private sector jobs are created when taxes are low, investment is high, and people are free to go about their business without the heavy hand of government. The president thinks innovation comes from government subsidies. Common sense conservatives know innovation comes from unleashing the creative energy of American entrepreneurs.

Everything seems to be “unexpected” to this administration: unexpected job losses; unexpected housing numbers; unexpected political losses in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New Jersey. True leaders lead best when confronted with the unexpected. But instead of leading us, the president lectured us. He lectured Wall Street; he lectured Main Street; he lectured Congress; he even lectured our Supreme Court Justices.

He criticized politicians who “wage a perpetual campaign,” but he gave a campaign speech instead of a state of the union address. The campaign is over, and President Obama now has something that candidate Obama never had: an actual track record in office. We now can see the failed policies behind the flowery words. If Americans feel as cynical as the president suggests, perhaps it’s because the audacity of his recycled rhetoric no longer inspires hope.

Real leadership requires results. Real hope lies in the ingenuity, generosity, and boundless courage of the American people whose voices are still not being heard in Washington.

- Sarah Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remind me again, which one is Sarah Palin? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. The one with the frizzy hair who's always doubtful about Moe's schemes
Usually gets her head clonked together with Curly's by Moe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's never written something that long in her entire pitiful life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Written? Hell except for maybe Daniel Steele she's never READ anything that long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That whole thing sounds so Laura Inghram Batshit-crazy
I bet she wrote it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh please. She didn't write that and we all know it! She'd have to have read
a newspaper or two!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. "In what aspect, Charlie?"
She didn't write a word of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7.  She is
Totally incapable of putting more than two words together coherently, she has proven that time and time again, no way in hell she could have thought that much and remembered it long enough to get it written down. Not possible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not interested in what children think of the State of the Union
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Sarah Palin penned version was something like this:
<word salad...free markets....more word salad...brave Americans....still MORE word salad...freedom....word salad, again, but this time with croutons and dressing!...government bad....big gulp of crazy juice, remember to tip your waiters and waitresses>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. you forgot-
*mendation*

heh heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. You forgot spineless elite Ivy league spineless
insider politicians. Silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Palin wrote this
I wrote 'Catcher in the Rye'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who cares what she says? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just like Bush
with Karl Rove.
Writing talking puppet head with somebody else's fist up them doing all the 'thinkin and smart stuff' for them.

I'll bet yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Failin would quit before writing half that much.



You betcha.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Quack.
Quack quack quack quack quackquackquack quack quackquack quack quackquackquack quack quackquack quack quack quack quackquackquack quack quack quack quack quackquack quackquackquack quack quackquackquack quack quackquack quack quackquackquackquack quack quack quackquack quack!

Quack quackquackquack quack quackquackquack quack quackquack...


And so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. flvegan's response to Palin's "response" to the State of the Union
I'd like to invite you to a conversation, sans speechwriters, over a steaming hot cup of fuck you. Cream or sugar, you moron?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. In what respect, flvegan?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:20 AM
Original message
Dammit, call me Charlie, Z-Dub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
27. Another one of your "gotcha" questions
Can I call you Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Liberal media!
You crack me the fuck up, Z-Dub, and I like that quite a bit.

I hope you'll FB friend me. You know who I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. If she wrote this, I'll register as a Republican.
I doubt she was even able to READ this, let alone write it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well she sure as hell didn't write that...
and I'll bet she had to google 'noblesse oblige.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mother! Oh God! Mother!
william kristol is palin.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not written at all by her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. i am profoundly dumber after reading that and...
i`m not sure if i`ll ever recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. She actually let it slip during and interview that she hadn't read her own book. She is profoundly

stupid and dishonest. Her moral instinct is to
lie even when telling the truth is easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. Palin did not write this, no f'ing way.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 12:50 AM by PufPuf23
But to find such a response to Obama's SOTU attributed to such an empty and unqualified being is scary as to source and obvious as to agenda.

This is my 1st Palin post ever.

edit meant to type "un" qualified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. True that she didn't write it
But it does have the same LPL ratio. Lies Per Line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. "Palin's" comments seem organized in this message
Beware whomever is behind her literacy.

PS Zappa fan here from late 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Ah, Zappa
If only he lived long enough to write about Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC