Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Ruling Spurs Corporation Run for Congress-First Test of “Corporate Personhood”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:45 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Ruling Spurs Corporation Run for Congress-First Test of “Corporate Personhood”
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 11:46 PM by kpete


Supreme Court Ruling Spurs Corporation Run for Congress
First Test of “Corporate Personhood” In Politics

Following the recent Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission to allow unlimited corporate funding of federal campaigns, Murray Hill Inc. today announced it was filing to run for U.S. Congress and released its first campaign video on www.youtube.com/user/murrayhillcongress

“Until now,” Murray Hill Inc. said in a statement, “corporate interests had to rely on campaign contributions and influence peddling to achieve their goals in Washington. But thanks to an enlightened Supreme Court, now we can eliminate the middle-man and run for office ourselves.”

Murray Hill Inc. is believed to be the first “corporate person” to exercise its constitutional right to run for office. As Supreme Court observer Lyle Denniston wrote in his SCOTUSblog, “If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission conferred new dignity on corporate “persons,” treating them — under the First Amendment free-speech clause — as the equal of human beings.”

Murray Hill Inc. agrees. “The strength of America,” Murray Hill Inc. says, “is in the boardrooms, country clubs and Lear jets of America’s great corporations. We’re saying to Wal-Mart, AIG and Pfizer, if not you, who? If not now, when?”

more:
http://murrayhillweb.com/pr-012510.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would be really sweet if this ends up at the SC.
Vote Murray Hill Inc.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Blossom Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now this is genius.
Why not get rid of the middleman and get the real thing elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. This needs to happen across the board: charges of murder from an enlightened Atty. General
Petitions for marriage licenses, etc. Bring it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. God, that would be AWESOME!
Toyota alone could have several "murder" charges brought up against if for the phony gas-pedal issue. Or at least, negligent homicide or manslaughter. This is going to get really interesting.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Enlightened pushback!
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 09:30 AM by DisgustedInMN
As I've said elsewhere. This mockery of democracy MUST be taken on in every venue. If the Justice Department wants to govern, then fine, lets make 'em govern. Overwhelm the court system with cases like this will surely prompt, both frivolous AND serious. Grind the entire system to a halt until this travesty is reversed.

NO HUMAN JUSTICE, NO FUNCTIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wish they were running against the Republican in my district. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great idea... and publicity for that business
Another thought is that if you have two progressive corporations looking to legally merge (e.g. stock purchase), instead have them seek to be legally "married" under the concept of corporate person hood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. What needs to happen is that the IRS should start TAXING them like individuals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC