Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bipartisan Deficit Commission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:21 AM
Original message
Bipartisan Deficit Commission
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 10:22 AM by FreakinDJ
Bush and the RATpubliCONs (sounds like the name of a Punk Band) couldn't touch Social Security even with all the supposed "Political Capitol" they thought they had after the 2004 elections.

The DEMs have been proposing "Raising the Cap" on SSI for years now as a means of Fixing Social Security. And if they tried to "Reduce Benefits" or alter these programs in any way they would meet even greater opposition then was used to flounder the "Bush and his Tour America Social Security Privatization Plan".

So NO - I don't think either party can curtail or significantly alter those programs without HUGE Public Outcry and the lingering ramifications of Political Suicide

What the RATpubliCONs have been doing to "Undo Social Security" is absolutely NOTHING.

They want to do absolutely NOTHING and wait until the "Shit Hits the Fan" then scream and cry "Oh we told you so". I feel Obama is addressing that scenario BEFORE it happens. He is going to force the RATpubliCONs into providing a solution before it melts down, and with the American Tax-Payer's extreme opposition to curtailing these programs that only leaves the obvious avenue of "Raising the Cap on SSI" - raising Taxes on folks making in excess of $250 per year, and eliminating Tax incentives for Corporations that are Outsourcing Jobs.

Personally I also feel it appropriate to increase the CAP of SSI taxes every time COLA increases Social Security payments. FDR originally proposed a "Pay As You Go" system and that would place the SSI system back on track for sustained solvency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. in today's climate there is no such thing as bi-partisanship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm going to kick this for more input, but I don't agree. I think we need to
stop wasting money on drilling-old tech for energy... We need to stop this war-killing to keep old tech. We need to use resources that create a better economic foundation, and stop straining those with nothing left but S.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. While your arguments are sound - its kind of a different subject
Yes they all effect the "Over-all" budget but my OP was attempting to deal with the "Entitlement Programs" specifically. Because that is how I believe the House and Senate will deal with them.

FDR's Social Security was originally set up as a "Pay as You Go" system. It wasn't until 1942, when America's sons were coming home from WWII in a box that RATpubliCONs saw a means to buy back some popularity from the American Public and made the changes to Social Security. FDR vetoed the proposal but was later "Overridden"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC