Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards's former mistress sues Andrew Young for return of 'very private' videotape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:34 PM
Original message
John Edwards's former mistress sues Andrew Young for return of 'very private' videotape


The sordid saga of John Edwards just got messier: The disgraced politician's former mistress, Rielle Hunter, has taken legal action to retrieve a "very private and personal" videotape from former Edwards aide Andrew Young, according to court documents obtained by the Associated Press.

"In or about September 2006, using my video camera, I authored a personal video recording that depicted matters of a very private and personal nature," Hunter wrote in an affidavit filed Thursday in North Carolina. "In 2006, I was also having an intimate relationship with Edwards." Hunter says she tried to destroy the video a few months later -- by pulling the tape out of the cassette -- and stored it in a box with personal belongings.

In Young's cringe-inducing campaign tell-all "The Politician," in bookstores on Saturday, he claims to have found a damaged tape marked "special" in a box of trash while cleaning out a house he had rented for Hunter. After re-spooling the tape, he watched it . . . only to find Edwards and a "visibly pregnant" woman, who wore jewelry identical to things Hunter would typically wear, doing something explicit.

<snip>

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/reliable-source/2010/01/john_edwardss_former_mistress.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a sad, ugly mess this has turned into. The only consolation I have is that
Edwards isn't president as this is all happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the whole thing has gone beyond tragedy and into comedy as far as I'm concerned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I wish I could find it funny
But I really don't. It would be if it weren't for Elizabeth being such a nice person who is also dying of cancer. The whole thing is sad and John Edwards is just pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yep. It's entered Jerry Springer territory.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. All I can think about is the poor kid.
That kind of tempers it. That, and when I think about the money and time I spent on that dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's it... draw even more attention to it Rielle
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
43. Do you worry after Ms. Hunter's well-being, or is that you imagine JE to be some weak & noble victim
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. There was already enough proof on Edwards and Hunter.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 02:38 PM by blue neen
I can't understand why it was necessary for Young to release the video tape. That makes him just as guilty as everybody else in this whole, sick mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Did he release the tape?
I didn't hear anything like that. I thought he only mentioned he took it as a sort of "life insurance". Her lawsuit only confirms its existence and that he is telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Honestly, I don't know.
I am assuming that he did, because he is the one who found it. Wouldn't it have been better to give it back? I just keep thinking about Edwards' children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. "Wouldn't it have been better to give it back?"
Not if you thought you may be killed for knowing too much. That was the explanation I read earlier from him. He made copies and put one in a safe deposit box and gave one to his lawyer in case of death.

I thought he was looney when I read that yesterday. But today, this lawsuit sheds some new light
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
53. I don't know. After watching 20/20 last night,
I'm a little skeptical of some of Young's motives and explanations. It all still comes down to this, though: Edwards really, really has made a mess out of a lot of people's lives. Thank God he is not the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Edwards...
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uncertain she has any right to its return.
She abandoned the personal property for eight months and didn't have legal possession or title of the premises where the personal property had been left behind. Would have been different if she had stored it in a storage locker with a monthly fee in her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That was my thought: abandoned property.
She needs to hope Young doesn't auction the thing off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. very good points, all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. This thread is useless without videotape
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Yup.....those DU'ers posting around us on this thread are all talk and NO TAPE
tularetom and the submariner aren't buying your story. we need video or photo clips }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. So, the tape does exist. Maybe she's getting a cut of the books sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. She claims it was a tape she tried to destroy...
...he says it was an unlabeled DVD. Somebody's not being honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
40. I think she left it there on purpose
so it would be found and seen and the truth of the affair would come out, she seems like a real operator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
50. The article says
..he claims to have found a damaged tape marked "special" in a box of trash while cleaning out a house he had rented for Hunter. After re-spooling the tape....

Seems to me it was a tape and there was an attempt to destroy if it had to be re-spooled.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Give the damn thing back to her but
burn it first. This stuff is sickening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who records stuff like this?
Why do so many people involved in these seamy scandals TAPE it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. narcissism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder how much Young was asking for it in blackmail? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I imagine if he was using it for blackmail, he would have been paid off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Not if Young was asking way too much. Edwards is rich, but not that rich.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 03:03 PM by earth mom
Don't forget Edward is a lawyer and probably figures the law will side with him and his girlfriend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. I think Young should ask a lot for it.
Rielle shook down Edwards well. Now its Young's turn to shake down Rielle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #37
54. How did Rielle shake down Edwards?
By making him pay child support for his child?

I guess you think any woman who asks for child support is "shaking down" the father?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Media expert doesn't know how to destroy a tape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. That tape belongs to Elizabeth Edwards and her legal team
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. she hardly needs it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. The tape is discoverable by Elizabeth's attorneys, and they should move for it.
They should also take Reille's deposition to authenticate the tape. Make it evidence. Make John and Reille move to seal the records. Make those two come in, say "yeah, that's us, doing it while Elizabeth was fighting cancer and John was meeting with campaign supporters."

Reille will likely get ultimate possession of the tape. Contrary to the old mangled saying possession is not 9/10 of the law. Possession is nine points of the law, but possession does not equal ownership, particularly of personalty of this nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. At least she would get the orginal tape -- How about all the copies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. She might be able to get all copies, eventually.
This is an area of law that has changed significantly in many jurisdictions over the past ten years. The rights to privacy of such video recordings are generally increased. The expectation of privacy of the person who made the tape, the knowledge and consent of the other person, and the efforts by them to keep the tape private would be factors.

Suppose the evidence shows that Reille showed the tape to Young, then told him he could have it. That would enable Young to keep the tape. Suppose she threw the tape away. If he got it out of the trash bag as it set by the curb, he might be able to maintain a claim to ownership. However, if she threw it in the trash in her home and he pulled it out of the trash there, he likely wouldn't be able to make the same claim of ownership.

I don't think Young intended to be able to keep the tape. He's about selling his book right now, and this really helps him sell it. He won't fight to keep it. He'll wait and see what Elizabeth's lawyers do. They're probably filing motions within a week to preserve the tape and get copies of it. If she ever gets all the copies, it won't be until the case is over.

This is the kind of evidence parties like John Edwards pay milliions extra to avoid having surface in court. He's so screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
46. Ah yes. And North Carolina is an "at fault" state. JE is toasted like Wonderbread in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am wondering why Rielle Hunter made that tape in the first place? Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindfulNJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Why did Monica keep the blue dress?
To think this scumbag might have been president...:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yes, I think Rielle kept it for the same reasons as Monica.
Rielle is a quiet a winner too. Not very classy on her part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. Yeah. As opposed to John, who's just oozing class out of every orifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. The reason Elizabeth should get a very large settlement is for her children.
And she should set up their inheritance in a trust-- so nobody else can get their hands on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Someone has to explain to me the idea of videotaping.....
a sexual encounter. Maybe it's me but I don't get it. Married.....maybe, but if I were a woman and a guy wanted to videotape us having sex or me naked I would run for the hills. It would tell me that his head was in a very bad place and trust me, I'm no prude. Being a guy and the woman wanted to tape it then I would really wonder and being a celebrity I would, again, run like hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. You would think
at Rielle's age, you would think she would have known better. I think she wanted this video for insurance, not for intimate memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #36
48. I think John wanted it for a masturbation aid.
I also think it's cool you know the mind of his groupies. That's awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. I don't think this can get anymore sordit.....
but I guess I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. if the tape was thrown in the trash, how can she claim ownership?
i think that the precedent was set in the case of Finders v. Keepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. She's claiming it wasn't in the trash but in a hatbox
so I guess that's where the ownership claim would come in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. If she abandoned the property, it could have been in a Faberge egg
and it wouldn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. Hidden thread number 17
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. How will any threads survive without you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. Helpful hint
There are certain posters who absolutely love to post national enquirer stuff. It's easier to put those posters on ignore than to just keep hiding their threads.

Julie--here to help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. The National Enquirer was right about Edwards, it's no longer just and NE story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
45. I believe Young on this ground alone:
"by pulling the tape out of the cassette -- and stored it in a box with personal belongings."

She was a professional filmmaker and videographer - that's how they met, right, she was filming his campaigns?

And yet, as late as 2006, she was claiming they were still using VIDEOTAPE?

I think not. By 2006, pretty much the only use for "videotape" in the real world was for old people recording their TV shows on increasingly creaky VCRs. I believe Young just because he said it was an unmarked DVD - which was surely the medium she would have used.

"Sex tape" is anachronistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. the whole thing is like a Jerry Springer episode...I have no
regard for any of them....prostitutes...that's what they all are...for money & power.

The only ones who have my sympathy are the Edward's kids (pre-mistress) who have to see and hear all of this disgusting information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
55. The most shocking thing aboutt this story

is that they were still using VHS cassette tape?! Really??? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
56. Funny... Young didn't mention the Dobermans, trapeze, whips, or the clown suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC