Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush went out of his way to avoid situations where he had to face critics in front of a camera

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:27 AM
Original message
Bush went out of his way to avoid situations where he had to face critics in front of a camera

The staged town halls.... the lack of press conferences.... every meeting with a prominent Democrat being behind closed doors.... being wired at the debates....



The difference is so striking.... it's like Bush and Obama are not even from the same planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, yeah..that's what
puppets do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Was thinking similar. We, in actuality, were without a President for 8 years.
There was just a vacuum there, which was unfortunately filled by all sorts of evil doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. So true ...
Eight years of Bush = Unpresidented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. DDDDDick Cheney resents that remark.
What do you think he was doing for those eight years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Filling the vacuum, with evil doing!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama's a gifted guy who's made his own way in life despite economic adversity.
GWB is a connected fratboy douche who got basically everything he had in life due to his family name and connections.

Both went to Ivy League schools but the paths taken and results are very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama is smarter than Bush and is not mean-spirited or dishonest
Obama genuinely seems like a GOOD PERSON. Rare for a politician, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Being wired at the debates? What's that all about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. This may jog your memory:
http://images.salon.com.nyud.net:8090/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/story.jpg

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate
Physicist says imaging techniques prove the president's bulge was not caused by wrinkled clothing.

By Kevin Berger
Oct 29, 2004 | George W. Bush tried to laugh off the bulge. "I don't know what that is," he said on "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, referring to the infamous protrusion beneath his jacket during the presidential debates. "I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt."

Dr. Robert M. Nelson, however, was not laughing. He knew the president was not telling the truth. And Nelson is neither conspiracy theorist nor midnight blogger. He's a senior research scientist for NASA and for Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and an international authority on image analysis. Currently he's engrossed in analyzing digital photos of Saturn's moon Titan, determining its shape, whether it contains craters or canyons.

For the past week, while at home, using his own computers, and off the clock at Caltech and NASA, Nelson has been analyzing images of the president's back during the debates. A professional physicist and photo analyst for more than 30 years, he speaks earnestly and thoughtfully about his subject. "I am willing to stake my scientific reputation to the statement that Bush was wearing something under his jacket during the debate," he says. "This is not about a bad suit. And there's no way the bulge can be described as a wrinkled shirt."

Nelson and a scientific colleague produced the photos from a videotape, recorded by the colleague, who has chosen to remain anonymous, of the first debate. The images provide the most vivid details yet of the bulge beneath the president's suit. Amateurs have certainly had their turn at examining the bulge, but no professional with a résumé as impressive as Nelson's has ventured into public with an informed opinion. In fact, no one to date has enhanced photos of Bush's jacket to this degree of precision, and revealed what appears to be some kind of mechanical device with a wire snaking up the president's shoulder toward his neck and down his back to his waist.

Nelson stresses that he's not certain what lies beneath the president's jacket. He offers, though, "that it could be some type of electronic device -- it's consistent with the appearance of an electronic device worn in that manner." The image of lines coursing up and down the president's back, Nelson adds, is "consistent with a wire or a tube."

Nelson used the computer software program Photoshop to enhance the texture in Bush's jacket. The process in no way alters the image but sharpens its edges and accents the creases and wrinkles. You've seen the process performed a hundred times on "CSI": pixelated images are magnified to reveal a clear definition of their shape.

Bruce Hapke, professor emeritus of planetary science in the department of geology and planetary science at the University of Pittsburgh, reviewed the Bush images employed by Nelson, whom he calls "a very highly respected scientist in his field." Hapke says Nelson's process of analyzing the images are the "exact same methods we use to analyze images taken by spacecraft of planetary surfaces. It does not introduce any artifacts into the picture in any way."

More:
http://dir.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/

This is only one source and one expert among MANY who studied photos of this cretin in his Presidential debates with John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Too bad most Americans didn't notice the bad Bush behavior and won't notice this outstanding Obama
behavior. Any suggestion that this contrast represents the truth will be dismissed as the "scientifically proven" liberal media bias. (And where were the debunkers of that flawed "study"? I was looking for them, and it took a great deal of determined googling to find the one or two who published anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. And meanwhile Bill-O-the-Dumb-F--K and that Drug Addicted Turd...
...among others were busily challenging the patriotism and intelligence of anyone who dared criticize their golden boy Bush. As well as to call said people all sorts of despicable names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. Shows Who Really Called The Shots...
Booooosh was an empty suit...just what the GOOP hierarchy loves. These aren't the politicians but the lobbyists, corportists and fundies who really call the shots and control the purse strings. booooosh made a perfect prop as his name was known and the corporate media made him look like a "regular" guy...ya know, the one you wanted to have a beer with. It was all orchestrated from the get-go, including rigging the primaries to knock out any real competition. They key to making it work was to keep booooshie on the script and create a "reality" that opened the door for their plundering of our treasury...including wars for profit, tax cuts for the rich, unfunded mandates to bankrupt the states (giving the federal even more control over them...so much for "states rights") and deregulating everything in sight that would benefit their coffers.

President Obama showed he was his own man...who can master the most complicated issues and explain and sell them to the populace. He didn't rely on handlers and cable teevee sockpuppets to "say what he really meant". It was all out there yesterday for all to see...a true leader in action. Here's hoping he now sees that "reaching around" to these slime merchants only gets you as dirty as they are.

As someone else proposed...let's see a rushpublican do the same with 140 Democrats...even with the blue dogs there. Mooselini? Another empty pantsuit who was all hat and no cattle. She'd be lucky to say defecit yet explain it. Brown? A male Palin. The only GOOPer who could do this might be Hucklenutz...but without talking points, the GOOP has nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC