Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House is 'done' with Yucca Mt.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:00 AM
Original message
White House is 'done' with Yucca Mt.
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 09:01 AM by bigtree
January 30, 2010

ST. GEORGE - The Yucca Mountain nuclear waste disposal site is finished, according to the White House, after administration officials announced a 15-person commission to find alternatives Friday.

The administration appointed former Rep. Lee Hamilton and former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft to run the commission, which includes scientists, industry representatives and former lawmakers. The commission is given 18 months to produce an interim report on better ways to store spent nuclear rods, with final results due within 24 months.

"Expanding our Nation's capacity to generate clean nuclear energy is crucial to our ability to combat climate change, enhance security, and increase economic prosperity," President Barack Obama wrote in a letter to the Department of Energy. "My Administration is undertaking substantial steps to expand the safe, secure, and responsible use of nuclear energy."

Yucca Mountain has been pegged as the nation's first permanent nuclear waste repository for more than 20 years, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other Nevada lawmakers strongly oppose using the site, located about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. President Obama has said he doesn't see Yucca Mountain as a viable option, and White House energy adviser Carol Browner said the White House is "done with Yucca."


read more: http://www.thespectrum.com/article/20100130/NEWS01/1300311/White-House-is-done-with-Yucca


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gecko6400 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. My God!
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 09:15 AM by Gecko6400
What a frightful waste of money this has been then (similar to the Super Conductor/Super Collider fiasco in TX). I just wonder where the administration envisions (surely they must have some idea or suggestions, at least) storing radioactive waste, as there are extreme NIMBY folks out there and justifiably so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The proposed loan guarantees just announced
. . . suggest to me that they are going to rely (in the short term, at least) on keeping the waste on-site at the nuclear facilities. The president has said he's comfortable with that arrangement until some other plan can be formulated and agreed on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC