Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Pam Tebow A Liar? Abortions Were Illegal In The Philippines...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:12 PM
Original message
Is Pam Tebow A Liar? Abortions Were Illegal In The Philippines...
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/pam-tebow-liar-abortions-were-illegal


Is Pam Tebow A Liar? Abortions Were Illegal In The Philippines When Her Doctor Supposedly Urged Her To Get One
By Susie Madrak Saturday Jan 30, 2010 11:00am


Pretty interesting, don't you think? An entire media mythology has grown up around the noble missionary who carried her child to term against a doctor's advice, and the child grows up to become a devout Christian and football star.

Or maybe not:

As Joe Jervis points out, we’ve been hearing the propaganda for weeks now about how Tim Tebow’s mother was confronted with a difficult pregnancy, encouraged to have an abortion, and made the heroic and courageous choice to carry the pregnancy to term, so that her son Tim would one day sport Bible verses in his eyeblack and have a really hard time at NFL tryouts. As you all know, the propaganda has become even fiercer as Focus on the Family has spent $2.5 million on an anti-choice ad to be aired during the Super Bowl featuring Tebow’s story.


Yeah, well, Gloria Allred begs to differ:

In her exclusive interview with RadarOnline.com, Allred slams the ad and CBS’s decision to air it, pointing out factual inconsistencies with Pam’s story. One glaring one is the fact that the act of abortion is totally illegal in the majority Catholic country of the Philippines – under all circumstances including rape and incest, and even without a provision in the circumstance that the mother’s life is in danger. The law has been in effect since 1930.

Allred says she believes it an impossible scenario to believe that {Filipino} doctors would {have} ever suggested abortion as a viable option for Tebow in the first place. And when you learn that physicians and midwives who perform abortions in the Philippines face six years in prison, and may have their licenses suspended or revoked, and that women who receive abortions – no matter the reason – may be punished with imprisonment for two to six years, it’s easy to see why.


Gloria Allred is threatening to sue CBS if they run the Tebow ad, saying if the ad fails to disclose that abortions were illegal at the time Tebow made her “choice”, "I intend to file a formal complaint of misleading advertising with those federal commissions.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was wondering when this would come out
The whole thing sounded fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy legend Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This can't be a surprise to anyone
The right makes a living off of embellishing a story or down right lying to push their agenda. The party that covers up the details of the death of a real hero in Pat Tillman to further support for a senseless war, give out no-bid contracts to their friends and run on family values while they are trying to score same sex lovin' in airport bathrooms, "hiking the appalachian trail", having their parents pay off staffers they had affairs with, and excuse perverts who like to text their underage paiges with obscene messages. If they can find some well-meaning useful idiot to help them along, so be it. The right could never stoop low enough to surprise me. Disgust me YES, surprise me no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Welcome to DU!
I agree, there are always MITIGATING circumstances for THEM.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. Go Colts... from the home of Peyton's college years!
And welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #48
76. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
100. Except for the fact that abortions were common in the Philippines?
In countries like the Philippines, where induced abortion is against the law,3* many women nevertheless seek an abortion—despite conditions that may put their health at risk—rather than give birth to children they cannot care for or do not want. A study using an indirect methodology estimated that in 1994, there were 400,000 induced abortions in the country and 80,000 women hospitalized for complications of induced abortion.4 The Department of Health of the Philippines reported that 12% of all maternal deaths in 1994 were the result of illegal abortion.5

Studies from the 1970s onward have shown that despite the law's severity, abortion appears to be widely practiced.6 Evidence from the mid-1990s indicates that Filipino women of all social classes and backgrounds are having induced abortions.7 They do so under varying circumstances, ranging from safe medical procedures performed for better-off women by trained personnel to procedures in extremely unsafe conditions for poor women who cannot afford to pay for a surgical abortion. The evidence of a survey of health professionals in the mid-1990s suggests that about one-third of women seeking an abortion obtain it from a doctor or nurse, but a high proportion of women consult traditional practitioners or attempt to induce the abortion themselves.8


http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3114005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical Republicon Family Values
Republicon Family Values might consider someday including the truth for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, they'll say "Well, if abortion HAD been legal she still wouldn't have had one."
Like that term paper of Obama's hoax. When the truth came out, they said "Well it was true in spirit" or something like that...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
94. Allegedly the doctors thought the fetus was already dead
If that is true (and I doubt if records exist to either support or refute it) then what they doctors were proposing was a D&C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #94
108. And when abortion was illegal in this country, that's what some doctors called it - a D&C
That was how middle income women got safe abortions -- that or travel to a state where it was legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #94
125. Wouldn't it have been a different story if the doctors thought the fetus was dead?
Isn't that an automatic removal because it's dangerous for the mother?

Wow. I wonder if Mrs. Tebow is going to amend her story on her own, or if the Tebows will brazen it out anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cojoel Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. you would have thought someone might have told them...
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. (Ex 20:16)

or something like that. Was that one ever on the eyeblack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. So dishonest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. A lot of people might not like her BUT
Allred is not to be intimidated. She goes after anybody if she has the facts behind her. And she ain't gonna let, CBS, Focus on the Family or the FCC off the hook. Look for her to take the bit between her teeth and get this stopped somehow. I know that if there is written proof, than ANY citizen out there can file a complaint with the FCC and go after CBS. And no matter what, after CBS banned the gay dating system ad (no matter it was from someone unknown) and is showing some of the worst stuff in other ads going they deserve to be sued and I hope the FCC levies a triple digit million dollar fine on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kceres Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I didn't really like her either, but she just won me over! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
82. Go Glo!!! Wow, she's nailed them! I hope they fold! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IcyPeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it was suggested by the Dr. ...
I suppose she could've left the Phillipines to get one legally, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Think about it
She was a religious zealot in a country that prohibits abortion, what doctor would suggest she have an abortion when there was no reason anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. The medicines she would have been
given wouldn't have injured the fetus anyway. In other words, the whole story is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. I hadn't heard that
What were the medicines? Some sort of anti-parasitic drug? What was medical opinion on their safety during pregnancy in the 80s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. I suspected she was lying all along.
Just didn't have the time to dig it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm curious as to how a lawsuit
for misleading advertising can be filed when no product is being sold.


I also don't see why so many pro-choice people are so incensed about this ad - she chose not to have an abortion, so what? Unless at the end of the ad she pushes for ending legal abortion, I don't see the problem.

Would anyone that is upset about this ad be upset about a woman that chose an abortion for health reasons doing a similar ad from the opposite point of view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You mean like Ted Bundy's mom saying "if only I had an abortion".
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 04:17 PM by merh
Or Dahmer's or McVeigh's or Bin Laden's?

Yes, I believe the majority of the pro-choice folks would find them just as distasteful and dishonest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. No, I mean like a woman
who was facing a devastating decision with a child she wanted to have, a child with severe disabilities that would have resulted in suffering and/or death after birth. A woman like so many of the women whose stories we heard during the abortion debates during the healthcare reform hearings.

A woman like the women that Dr. Tiller helped for so many years.

If one of these women was going to do a spot during the Super Bowl, would the current outrage still be there? Or are we only expected to be outraged at the story of one choice and not the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes, there would be the uproar.
My example is a better example of the mirror opposite of the Tebow commercial.

And I believe there would be the uproar if the commercial you suggested were to be aired. It would be heard from the misguided fools who believe that pro-choice equals anti-life or murderers.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I have no doubt there would be outrage on the right
I'm asking if there would be outrage on the left.

I doubt there would be.

I don't see a problem with the Tebow ad or the one I described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. But CBS will not allow the airing of a commercial contrary to Tebows
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 05:21 PM by merh
that is the point.

And neither Tebows or your suggested commercial is appropriate for the Super Bowl.

But you know that.

And my suggested commercial is the more appropriate counter commercial to the Tebow commercial.

The Tebow commercial is "look what the world would have lost had I aborted my fetus".

The commercial I suggest is "look how better off the world would be if these mothers aborted their fetuses."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I guess I missed it
Did someone try to air an ad that told the story of a woman that chose to abort?

And, no I don't know that the Tebow ad or the one I suggested is inappropriate - to the contrary, I find neither of them to be inappropriate.

Please try to refrain from telling me what I know, as you obviously aren't very good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. LOL - you aren't very good at it
:rofl:

And just imagine in Mother Mary had aborted, where would Christianity be?

You are a laugh riot, that's for sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Ah, the laughing smiley
last resort of those with no response to facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. I had a response, one you didn't even bother to respond to.
And if you go back and review our discourse, it was you posting without facts.

You do make me laugh though, I find your sort so entertaining.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. My sort?
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 09:11 PM by FLDCVADem
You mean the sort that uses logic rather than histrionics to make a point?

***edited to add: What didn't I respond to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. You didn't use logic.
You minimized and excused, but you did not use logic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #61
72. Google is your friend...CBS has had a long-standing policy of not
allowing advocacy ads...now they've changed their minds...there's a nice list of progressive groups they've denied airing ads in the past...such as MoveOn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #72
89. Yes, I know
but when did they specifically not allow an ad contrary to Tebow's, as contended?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
62. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
93. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
130. the point of it is CBS has a history of refusing to air political/hot-button advocacy ads
and they have given flimsy reasons for doing so... The fact that they are allowing this is inconsistent to say it mildly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
113. CBS Is Offering Companies An Opportunity to Place An Ad
I heard on the news Friday that CBS is offering groups the opportunity to place pro-choice ads. But, like the Tebow ad, they have to pay for the space. I think the space is worth $2.5 to $2.8 million for a 30 sec spot. Supposedly neither the words abortion or pro-life show up in the ad, simply the pair's story, according to CBS.

I wouldn't be surprised if when we actually do get to see the ad, if it isn't nearly as controversial as the conversation about it has been sounding. I wonder if this an effort to drum up more viewers...not that the Super Bowl in and of itself isn't enough to drum up a large viewing audience.

I wonder if the conversation about the ad has actually caused more discussion about pro-life issues than the actual ad would have provided. It's gotten a lot of free press from the media. You can't put a price on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
77. I for one would have no problem with the ad....
if it was truthfully, I'm so tried of lies being used politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #77
114. Thank you for your answer
and for understanding what I'm trying to say.

While I'll have to see the ad before I know for sure, what I've heard of it is a woman telling the story of her decision. Now, if at the end of the ad, she calls for the overturning of Roe v. Wade or for otherwise eliminating choice, then obviously my view of it would change.

I'm just confounded at why anyone that truly believes in choice would be offended because a woman wants to talk about the choice she made. Why are so many people so afraid of people that make choices different from those we might have made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
91. CBS ALREAD REFUSED TO AIR A FEW ADS FROM OUR SIDE!!!
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 11:23 AM by TankLV
where the fuck have you been?!!!

plus the FACT that the claims in this ad is a TOTAL LIE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
60. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. There has never been a push to advertise for a service that women have sought throughout history
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 04:39 PM by me b zola
Women have on their own sought reproductive health care privately-and in many places and times secretly. Providers and advocates really don't have the resources to advertise because they are under constant legal and terrorist attacks. Receiving any medical services from Planned Parenthood is like maneuvering through an obstacle course because of there has been so much restrictive legislation making it difficult for practitioners of women's reproductive health care to just do their jobs.

I really don't have patience for anybody decrying the rights of those who oppose the concept that a woman should be trusted to make health care decisions with her physician~or anybody who is concerned about that viewpoint. Give up some of your basic rights and allow yourself to be treated as a child who must seek permission to receive health care and then we can talk. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Lighten up Francis
I'm not in favor anyone's reproductive rights being taken away. I'm simply asking what is wrong with a woman doing an ad saying that she chose not to abort?

Choice should be choice, regardless of the decision made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. If's wrong is she says that she "chose" but it's a lie
According to the OP she didn't have an actual choice. Philippine law criminalizes abortion, so there is almost no chance her doctor would have recommended it and no chance she would have gone ahead with in. That make the claim a lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Right, because there was no such thing as air travel
in, what, 1987? And of course, when abortion was illegal here, no doctors EVER counseled it or performed abortions, right?

What I'm seeing is a bunch of people that are pissed off about a woman speaking publicly about a decision they don't agree with.

So much for "choice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. And did she have the money to fly, wherever?
I'm not sure but it seems to me that she didn't have the wherewithal to go anywhere. At least not to the U.S. which is a long way.

but this is besides the point. The point is that she said she "CHOSE" to have the child. The point is, "She had no choice."

Your post does not contradict this, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Yes, she did have a choice
Why do you find it unbelievable that she could have left the country to have an abortion, had she wanted to do so? Why do you find it so hard to believe that some women will choose not to have an abortion, even when they know the risks of carrying a pregnancy to term?

I'm pro-choice, which means I support the right of every woman to choose what is best for HER circumstances, not what's best for a political agenda on either side of the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #65
87. If she was so sick that her doctor illegally suggested that she
illegally terminate her pregnancy, exposing both doctor and patient to several years in prison, then she was too sick to travel to another country, where such services were legal.

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #87
137. Hmm...not necessarily true
When my mother was pregnant with my sister, her kindly, family oriented doctor suggested she have an abortion because he didn't deem it safe for her health. When she refused, he told her he couldn't be her doctor anymore. My mother had a heart condition. She was healthy enough to travel. But, at the time, he didn't think her healthy enough to carry a baby full term. He had been her physician for 15 years, but the moment she decided she wanted a second opinion, he balked.

So, she started going to a physician at another facility, who actually did perform abortions, but this physician insisted that he could help her deliver the baby to term and he did. He told her it would be risky, but if she was willing to take the risk, he could help her.

I remember going with her sometimes to the clinic where this physician worked sometimes, these people would rush up to us and show us pictures of fetuses (horrible pictures), but what they didn't know is that my mother was there to save herself and her baby. I was about 10 then. Old enough to be horrified and confused. "Why would these people show these pictures to a child? That's just sick."

My mother is decidedly pro-choice. She defends this vehemently. But, she chose to have her baby. For me, her story has value. Because, now I have a wonderful sister in the deal. It simply makes me feel good to hear it.

I think the ad is going to be a "feel good" ad. Not an ad condemning abortions or people who choose to have them for whatever reason. But, we'll see. We're on Super Bowl countdown now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
124. You are wrong
abortions were common in the Philippines - the law was routinely ignored. A third of all abortions were conducted by doctors or nurses.

She would have had no problem finding a doctor willing to do an abortion.

Look at post 104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. The point being that in years past, CBS has refused such ads as.
All people, including gays are accepted by certain churches. They won't accept an ad deemed "controversial" from a liberal standpoint, but along comes Timmie Teabag and his mommy, as spokespeople for James Dobson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
96. SHE DID NOT "CHOOSE NOT TO ABORT"!!!! THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!!!
ABORTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN ILLEGAL IN THE PHILLIPINES!!!

SHE COULN'T HAVE "CHOSEN NOT TO ABORT" EVEN IF SHE CLAIMED SHE DID!!!

goddamn lady - stop spewing your crap and READ WHAT THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #96
103. If she was not a prisoner while in the PI, then she could well have
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 12:35 PM by Obamanaut
flown to another country (there was air travel even in the 1980's), but it would appear that she CHOSE not to.

And by the way, 'illegal' does not equal 'never happens'

edited to add post #104. "Estimated abortion rate in the Philippines about 25 per 1,000 women per year"

It would seem that there are some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #96
115. Are you always so angry
when people disagree with you?

BTW, I've stuck to the facts, whereas you're assuming all sorts of unknowns and acribing Pam Tebow's actions to your assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. It Does Seem odd that one would use "rights" as an argument to take away other's rights
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 05:24 PM by fascisthunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. There is a "product" being sold..the overturning of
Roe v. Wade. Being done with a misleading (lie) advertisment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. Ah, so the ad calls for the overturning of Roe v. Wade?
I hadn't heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
70. If Tebow et al want to abolish a woman's constitutional right to privacy
in making reproductive choices, yes it does mean overturning Roe. Focus on the Family is an antichoice organization. Hint, hint: anything they support with their money with regard to reproductive choice has to basically be about ending a constitutional right women how have. We are in a fight for our daughters and granddaughters rights as citizens, if not their very lives. Taking away a constitutional right is an appalling thought to me. Yet that is what FOTF exactly wants to do. Please do not downplay that aspect of this whole debate. This business is too serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
126. Why do you think Focus on the Family is spending $2.8 million?
If you think this is just a "feel-good" story re: Tim Tebow and his mother, you're dumber than a box of hair. Then again, I think there's another agenda here.

Focus on the Family is hemorrhaging money and supporters. They have been for several years now. This is their last-ditch effort to get Roe v. Wade overturned via "oh, gosh, those evil abortionists almost took away Tim "Baby Jesus" Tebow! Nooo! !!!!111!!!!!"

I hope Gloria Allred is successful. Either the Super Bowl accepts all "advocacy" ads, or none at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
80. I'm willing to bet money the ad won't have anything to do with outlawing abortion
I predict a simple "choose life" message, that will be a major let-down for people on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. I think Focus on the Family sells a "product"
They certainly make a lot of money selling something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. Corporations are people and Christianity is a product
Just sayin . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
73. The point is that if abortion's illegal
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 10:43 AM by smoogatz
the "choice" is give birth or go to jail. That's not an actual choice--it is, in fact, the absence of choice. If abortion's illegal, women are coerced by the government into giving birth whether they want to or not. The choosing has already been done for them, by the government. So, saying you "chose" to keep the baby in a country where both seeking and providing abortions are criminal acts is disingenuous. Got it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #73
95. Allegedly the doctors thought the fetus was already dead (i.e. a miscarriage)
If that is true (and I doubt if records exist to either support or refute it) then what they doctors were proposing was a D&C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. A d&c is not an abortion.
Still disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #90
118. I hope you get some help for your anger issues
It can't be good for you to have so much anger for those that disagree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
105. Aw, don't be sad, I'm certain your precious ad will be shown.
And that will make you feel better about the recent courtroom bad news, won't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #105
119. It's not my ad
I just don't see the big deal.

And what recent courtroom bad news are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. i can`t wait till her bawling baby gets whacked really hard in the nfl
god ain`t going to help him when a 330lb linebacker flattens his christian ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElmoBlatz Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Sounds like you wish she went through with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. WHAT? A good christian woman a liar? No way! Christians never lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Another fetus fetishist is exposed as a craven liar
Gee whiz, what a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Until today, I had never heard of the Tebows.
Pam or her son. (I seriously don't do sports. Or follow the lives of missionaries.)

A couple of points are in order.

The first is the usual response to efforts to make abortion illegal in the US. Even if illegal, women are still going to have them. It's not like "illegal" = "can't be done." Drugs are illegal in the US, right? It's not like good doctors don't advise people to have illegal procedures if they think the procedures should be legal.

The second is that she was American. Could a Philipino doctor recommend that somebody get a procedure legal in the US in the US? I'm guessing the answer is, "Sure."

Then again, this "get an abortion" claim has been around for a few years (the wiki page for her son links to a 2007 article; the link's still live) and apparently is associated not just with the amoebic dysentery but with "placenta abruptus." So while the drugs used to treat amoebic dysentery can be nasty to the fetus, we don't have to assume that she had fairly esoteric knowledge about the drugs used. Although if that were the only thing that could motivate the alleged advice, it would argue for its reliability.

Might be true. Might not be. Don't have enough info. And really, don't much care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElmoBlatz Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. But couldn't she have just flown to the US to get one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Sorry, no facts allowed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
53. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't know if her story is true or not but
I'm so tired of hearing some pro-life Christians pat themselves on the back for doing the courageous thing. It's not very humble. It's my experience that the truly heroic and courageous people of the world don't go around bragging about it. It is usually the meek and humble ones that are truly heroic and they're usually the ones you never hear about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. happy to offset an unrec with a rec. Thank Gawd Ms. Allred has finally taken up a worthwhile cause.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. There is this tidbit, right from the OP, that suggests it might have been
as the Tebow family claims. parens in quotation are mine

"Allred says she (1)believes it an (2)impossible scenario to believe that {Filipino} doctors would {have} ever suggested abortion as a viable option for Tebow in the first place. And (3)when you learn that physicians and midwives who perform abortions in the Philippines face six years in prison, and may have their licenses suspended or revoked..."

(1)'believes' is not proof of anything


(2)"...impossible scenario to believe that {Filipino} doctors would {have} ever suggested abortion..." and (3) "...when you learn that physicians and midwives who perform abortions..."

If it is true that physicians and midwives who perform abortions are penalized, then it must also be true that some do perform them. If that is true, then it IS indeed possible to believe that a (Filipino) doctor may have suggested such a procedure.

It is also possible that the above mentioned doctor may have even suggested going out of the country for this procedure. There was air travel to/from Philippines even then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I would think a physician under those circumstances
would be very reluctant to recommend an abortion, because it could be cause for him to be put in jail for suggesting one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Illegal to suggest an abortion? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. In the Philippines? Yes.
It would be something like "inducement to seek abortion services" or "coercion to obtain an abortion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I'd like to see a cite for that claim n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. Read the OP
Yes--abortion is illegal. Anyone participating or aiding in one is eligible for jail.

Including the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. I read the OP
and I saw nothing that said it was illegal for a doctor to suggest an abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Can we assume that some in fact do just that, sub rosa? And some
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 05:14 PM by Obamanaut
are caught. The OP clearly states that the ones who do ARE penalized by imprisonment for performing the procedure.

I think the crux of this matter is that no one wants to give Ms Tebow the benefit of the doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. Ms Tebow is now spokeswoman for FoF
A major political player with extremely controversial positions.

She is promoting that organization by appearing on their ads.

She had no right to think she would be immune from any questions, especially about a story that has some gaping holes in it.


Although I'm sure FoF thought/hoped that she would would enjoy immunity, being a good Christian, mom to football hero, etc., she has no right to be exempt from skepticism when she throws her story out in public on the most-watched TV show of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
107. Obviously, some posters think that makes her MORE trustworthy, not less. Amazing. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
112. I think it very likely to find a doctor recommending abortion
considering how common it was.


In countries like the Philippines, where induced abortion is against the law,3* many women nevertheless seek an abortion—despite conditions that may put their health at risk—rather than give birth to children they cannot care for or do not want. A study using an indirect methodology estimated that in 1994, there were 400,000 induced abortions in the country and 80,000 women hospitalized for complications of induced abortion.4 The Department of Health of the Philippines reported that 12% of all maternal deaths in 1994 were the result of illegal abortion.5

Studies from the 1970s onward have shown that despite the law's severity, abortion appears to be widely practiced.6 Evidence from the mid-1990s indicates that Filipino women of all social classes and backgrounds are having induced abortions.7 They do so under varying circumstances, ranging from safe medical procedures performed for better-off women by trained personnel to procedures in extremely unsafe conditions for poor women who cannot afford to pay for a surgical abortion. The evidence of a survey of health professionals in the mid-1990s suggests that about one-third of women seeking an abortion obtain it from a doctor or nurse, but a high proportion of women consult traditional practitioners or attempt to induce the abortion themselves.8


http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3114005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #112
121. Why are there no replies to your posts by the folks who want to insist
there are no abortions in the PI?

Surely they've been read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. Facts always kill a righteous rant - there are a lot of (self)righteous people here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
51. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
66. I wonder what the response to the ad will be. How many men will
want to watch an anti-abortion ad during the super bowl?

I know CBS said that they had sold all the ad spots and that's why they rejected ManCrunch, but I wonder. Ad response in the super bowl has not done all that well since Apple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Here's one man's response...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #67
81. "Leave God alone, and let him enjoy the game." Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
68. If it is like UAE, then D&C IS legal...
Doctors even refer to it as 'abortion' weirdly enough though abortion is illegal.

D&C would be used in problem pregnancies and miscarriages.

I don't doubt doctors may have offered Ms. Tebow a D&C.


However, that doesn't change the fact that she's a moralizing sack of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #68
101. abortion means to abort
it has come to mean the deliberate aborting.

Medically they now use the term "spontaneous abortion" to mean what most people call "miscarriage".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
69. After years of fighting the womb Nazis here
in Australia where the topic is pretty much uncontroversial and the overwhelming majority believe in a woman's right to access abortion if she chooses it doesn't surprise me that a little creative editing is used by the extreme whack jobs that this debate produces in the US.

However over and above her 'leave a few facts out' method of story telling, who CARES if SHE chose to continue with her pregnancy. Bully for her. Is there ANYONE in the US advocating that women MUST abort?

She had her choice and should leave other people to theirs without her nauseating self righteousness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
71. K & R
and kudos to Gloria Allred.

Re the whole discussion about Pam Tebow flying to another country to have the abortion done: I wish people would thing in practical terms before they post.

Missionaries usually have no money to spare for overseas trips or to pay for an abortion.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. yep, she had a C H O I C E, didn't she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
75. All kinds of bleating and braying. And still, nobody has actually seen the ad yet.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #75
129. Gee. Do you think a PETA ad would be more or less likely to be pro meat?
Or would you have to wait and see the ad to make that determination first? :rolleyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #129
136. I think a PETA ad could be pro-choice on meat
I'd have to see it first.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
79. This is a good reason why all liberal minded Americans must stick together...
or this country is headed back to the dark ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cartach Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
83. Illegal ? Since when
has the fact that abortions are illegal in certain jurisdictions deterred certain Doctors from performing them ? Gloria Allred will fall flat on her face and so she should. As a lawyer especially, the last thing she should do is say that because something is illegal it was unlikely to or didn't, happen. What a bunch of unadulterated crap and Im surprised that so many DU'ers are naive and /or bigoted enough to go along with it. Sounds like a lot of overreaction to the fact someone is a Christian. Who the hell cares ? And if you do get all worked up about this and fall for the BS you're just a bad as the right wing zealots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #83
85. Really? So. . .why would a doctor suggest a procedure
in a country where the procedure is illegal and he would face six years in prison. . .to a patient who is an alleged "Christian" missionary?

Wouldn't her very religious belief already dictate to her that she never really had a choice and it would be ridiculous for any doctor to risk losing his license, his practice, and face six years in prison to tell a "Christian" missionary to consider an abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #85
99. Abortions are (and were) were common in the Philippines
In countries like the Philippines, where induced abortion is against the law,3* many women nevertheless seek an abortion—despite conditions that may put their health at risk—rather than give birth to children they cannot care for or do not want. A study using an indirect methodology estimated that in 1994, there were 400,000 induced abortions in the country and 80,000 women hospitalized for complications of induced abortion.4 The Department of Health of the Philippines reported that 12% of all maternal deaths in 1994 were the result of illegal abortion.5

Studies from the 1970s onward have shown that despite the law's severity, abortion appears to be widely practiced.6 Evidence from the mid-1990s indicates that Filipino women of all social classes and backgrounds are having induced abortions.7 They do so under varying circumstances, ranging from safe medical procedures performed for better-off women by trained personnel to procedures in extremely unsafe conditions for poor women who cannot afford to pay for a surgical abortion. The evidence of a survey of health professionals in the mid-1990s suggests that about one-third of women seeking an abortion obtain it from a doctor or nurse, but a high proportion of women consult traditional practitioners or attempt to induce the abortion themselves.8


http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3114005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #99
120. That doesn't answer the question.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #120
123. Sure it does
it demonstrates that the law was so laxly enforced that health care professionals routinely ignored it. Why would a doctor suggest an abortion? Because he could pick up some extra cash and he knew he could get away with it. Or, if you want a more positive reason, the doctor supported a woman's right to choose and was willing to risk incarceration.

In any case, there is nothing here that make Pam Tebow a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #123
127. Why would he suggest an abortion to an alleged "Christian"
missionary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. Perhaps he understands human nature better then you do
perhaps he understands that some peoples beliefs are not so strong in times of crisis. Perhaps he understands that some people are hypocrites. I don't know - just like you I wasn't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #128
132. Apparently not. . .
since the whole point of the advertisement is to emphasize that she made the correct "choice."

But given the predispositions of her "faith" - which also demands these choices not be permitted for anyone - it is rather difficult to fathom that she struggled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #132
134. Not everyone is as strong as you are?
not every choice is easy - I understand perfectly why her choice was difficult having been in a similar situation myself.

Why is it so important to hate this woman? You disagree with her abortion views - that doesn't make her evil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #127
133. Perhaps for health and well being of the patient? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #83
92. Best post on the entire thread
Granted, Wikipedia is not the best of sources, so take it for what it's worth. But according to numbers there, ~400,000 abortions were performed in the Phillipines in 1994, with 2/3 of them being self-induced or performed by practitioners of folk medicine. That leaves 1/3 or ~133,333 performed by whom? Doctors? But of course they wouldn't do that, because it's illegal.

Just like doctors in the U.S. never performed abortions when they were illegal...right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #83
109. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #83
111. seems like you are the one falling for the unadulterated crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
84. What total bullshit....
...She's a "good" Christian? I guess lying is OK then, right? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
86. Who gives a fuck
Like one ad in the super bowl will change anyone's mind. I say let the right-wing fuckwads at Focus blow their two mill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
88. ...but yet MoveOn STILL can't air an ad that THEY can pay for...
it's the HYPOCRISY...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
98. Estimated abortion rate in the Philippines about 25 per 1,000 women per year
In countries like the Philippines, where induced abortion is against the law,3* many women nevertheless seek an abortion—despite conditions that may put their health at risk—rather than give birth to children they cannot care for or do not want. A study using an indirect methodology estimated that in 1994, there were 400,000 induced abortions in the country and 80,000 women hospitalized for complications of induced abortion.4 The Department of Health of the Philippines reported that 12% of all maternal deaths in 1994 were the result of illegal abortion.5

Studies from the 1970s onward have shown that despite the law's severity, abortion appears to be widely practiced.6 Evidence from the mid-1990s indicates that Filipino women of all social classes and backgrounds are having induced abortions.7 They do so under varying circumstances, ranging from safe medical procedures performed for better-off women by trained personnel to procedures in extremely unsafe conditions for poor women who cannot afford to pay for a surgical abortion. The evidence of a survey of health professionals in the mid-1990s suggests that about one-third of women seeking an abortion obtain it from a doctor or nurse, but a high proportion of women consult traditional practitioners or attempt to induce the abortion themselves.8


http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3114005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
102. Interesting article.
I read this in the Bedford On Sunday newspaper about a 16 year old girl in England who had an abortion:

"News - The girl, 16, who wishes to remain anonymous
The girl, 16, who wishes to remain anonymous
The girl lives in Luton but has been kicked out of home by her strictly religious mother, who was born and raised in the Philippines where abortion is illegal and carries a jail sentence.

The teenager who has told Luton & Dunstable Express the full scale of her horror story, was two months pregnant when she underwent the termination at a clinic on January 4.

Four days later she began suffering side effects of ‘unbearable pain’ and blood loss and was rushed by ambulance to A&E at Luton and Dunstable Hospital.

After emergency treatment, she was placed on a drip in a ward where she recognised the nurse as being a friend of her auntie, who told the mother about the abortion the next day. The girl, having recovered and been released from hospital, was confronted by her mother, who had raised her according to her strict Catholic beliefs, and an argument ensued.

The daughter then left the house but was sent text messages from her mother saying: ‘You f...ing make me sick, ashamed, disgusted – I hope you rot in hell’ and calling her a ‘murderer’.

The girl is a British national and a Catholic, but is not deeply religious like her mother".


Here's a link to the full article;

http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/bedsonsunday-news/displayarticle.asp?id=479750
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. good catholic mom, huh?
bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. You're right about that.
Horrible woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
106. I had already decided to boycott...
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 12:46 PM by DisgustedInMN
.. watching the SB because of CBS's choice to air the ad. This simply cements it for me.

As to Repubs and especially NUTJOB "good christians" lying to advance their bigotted, narrow-minded, hate-filled, inhuman agenda? Well, no shit, that's SOP for them. It's only news when they don't lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #106
117. We're going skiing. Great time to hit the slopes. Won't watch SB either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
116. Perhaps she never trusted a Filipino doctor to lay hands on her
and went to a doctor at the US Base...

I wonder...

That would be just as bad in my book since she wouldn't trust the natives she was supposedly there to mission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
131. GO PAM!!! GO TIM!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrickey Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
135. Pam Tebow, Gloria Alread, Abortion
Pam Tebow is not lying. I've lived in the PI for 25 years. Among the poor, abortion is the PRIMARY form of birth control. Among the not-so-poor, abortion is also common. Abortion is commonly performed by doctors, non-medical doctors, or through taking medication which will abort early pregnancy. Yes, it is technically illegal, but yes, it is common in the Philippines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #135
138. Good Luck!
I never doubted that. Since when did people stop doing anything, simply because it was illegal? I'm looking forward to the Super Bowl and now, I definitely want to see the ad,just to see if the hoopla was worth it. I usually like the game and the ads. I used to love the Bud Bowl.

I'm hoping the Saints will win, and as long as no one's clothing malfunctions, it should be fun.

I need to start surfing the web for Chili recipes...maybe a good 7 bean Chili.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC