Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I feel shame and regret for having supported the Iraq war ... so why can't Blair?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:39 PM
Original message
"I feel shame and regret for having supported the Iraq war ... so why can't Blair?"
"The news from Iraq was bad last week, just as it has been so often these past seven years.

Three Baghdad bombs on Monday, which killed 41, and another 18 blown up next day: by the middle of the week, more than twice as many Iraqis had been murdered by terrorists as died in the 1998 attack in Omagh, the worst atrocity of the Northern Ireland troubles.

Meanwhile, the Shia-dominated government barred hundreds of Sunni candidates from standing in the coming elections, so undermining their legitimacy and arousing fears that the country is sliding back to the bloodbath of 2006 to 2007.
Blair-Bush


As a journalist who, in 2003, fervently believed that invading Iraq was justified – both in terms of our security and morally, to remove a truly odious regime – I shuddered when I heard that news and, as I have done so often in the intervening years, I wished I could have my time again."


More: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1247424/I-feel-shame-regret-having-supported-Iraq-war---Blair.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yea Saddam Hussain was a bad man..so is W, poppy, kissinger
and all the neokkkons with pnac. They should be eliminated with x prejudice.
I said in 1998 when I had seen a partial copy that the new 'Pearl Harbor event' they needed to start their new world order would lead to war with Iraq and or Iran..I was called foolish and worse.

I told you so! not that brings any satisfaction on my part just disgust at how easily murkins are manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ironically, as bad as he was, he was the most liberal guy in the region.
His country was the most 'western' going. Women could do things in Iraq that would get them whipped to death in Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep
And that is why Saudi Arabia was more than happy to have us take out Saddam.
His liberalist human views were once upon a time the biggest threat to the kingdom.

That and Saddam was keeping oil prices low by flooding the market at opportune times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There's your 'deal with the devil'. He was 'our guy'.
"How would you like your own country?"
"You can do whatever you like"
"Just sign right here"
"Don't worry about the fine print - it's just standard contract stuff..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep
They suckered him in and used him for their own purposes.
They do plan this shit well in advance.

Old saying goes something like this: there are no accidents in political decisions and how they are arrived at.

Hell, I've used others to get my way plenty of times. Saddam was just on the world stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. My guess is that the reporter will never have his comments used as evidence
against him at a warcrime tribunal. Blair may be just a teeny bit concerned about that. I guess it's like how lawyers tell you not to apologize to the other driver after a wreck - the apology is an admission of guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC