Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Umm, whaaaat??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:42 PM
Original message
Umm, whaaaat??
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 03:51 PM by madamesilverspurs
The following was posted (in our local newspaper) as a comment about the recent Supreme Court decision:


"The Supreme Court had to do this. It was and is the only way to save NBC so it can come up with the ad dollar revenue to not go broke from the Conan/Jay tonight show fiasco and the incredible overpriced bid they are now forced to pay to air the Olympics live and finalize the Comcast merger. This lifting of corporate and union spending on TV ads is necessary to save "free" TV as well as NBC. If this did not happen, NBC was going to be forced to run 12 to 14 hours a day of Sham WOW and Pocket Fisherman commercials, both companies that Roberts, Scalito, Thomas, Kennedy, and Alito have filed numerous consumer complaints with unsuccessfully. They have decided the best way to fight back was to allow unregulated corporate/union backed political ads to compete for Sham WOW and Pocket Fisherman ad space to get back at them, that is the behind the scenes story on this landmark decision. Watch TMZ tonight."

a response to a letter to the editor 1/31/10
http://www.greeleytribune.com/article/20100131/OPINION/100139942/1028&ParentProfile=1025

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
protect our future Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What newspaper in what state, please? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ooops...
forgot the link, edited the OP, thanks for the headsup!

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a complete "WTF?"
Somebody started drinking early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. If I'm reading this right...
...then the SCOTUS ruling in Citizens United v. FEC was motivated by the Supremes' desire to get those dreadful ShamWow commercials off the TV? So we've thrown away our democracy in order to never have to see Vince Offer again? Hmmm. Actually, it seems like a pretty fair trade to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "You're really gonna like my Nuts."
Now having said that and seeing this is from Greeley, (Weld county) Colorado... I am not surprised at all... really that place is infested with republicans. they sent Marylin Musgrave(R) to congress after all, a real loony toon...
that seat is Betsy Markey(D) now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. NBC/GE is fine.
Are we supposed to cry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Conan should do movies.
I'd like to see a remake of Son of Flubber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wish SCOTUS did not have to spend so much time on Pocket Fisherman ...
or rather, apparently, the right-wing members of the Court, who are apparently obsessed with Ron Popeil. Think of the things that could be done.



????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Uhhh.....wait a minute, still parsing that out...ummm
Ok..I remember where I have heard that kind of thought flow before.
In my Haldol deprived patients.

that is almost pure word salad.

But as good a reason for the court decision as any, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, when I first read it
I thought, "Palin reads OUR paper?!"

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC