Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reason the Republicans are so adamant about not cooperating for the good of the country:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 01:45 PM
Original message
The reason the Republicans are so adamant about not cooperating for the good of the country:
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 01:51 PM by skip fox
As Rachel Maddow has recently noted, the Republicans are so fiercely unified in their opposition to Obama that they now vote and speak against proposals and ideas they they previously endorsed and, occasionally, developed. The reason? Simple . . .

They had nominated, promoted and succeeded in electing the worst president of the past four decades, perhaps the worst of all.

Obama's success would chisel that fact on the public's consciousness so prominently that even the fecal smear machine of Fox & Fiends could not obscure it.

(If this is the case, Obama can think of ways possibly around it. Widening the sense of successful accomplishment beyond himself or his party, for instance.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama Loses/They Win
or so they think. They don't care a damn about America which was evident over the eight
years they did everything possible to destroy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyton Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. nope, nothing to do with Bush
They've already removed his memory from their psyche. Bush is so last year.

They've simply bought 100% into the idea that they must oppose *everything* any dem proposes (or endorses) else they're be targeted by the dittoheads and the teabaggers and lose their next primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it is deeper than that
I think if a Black man were to succeed it would counter everything they base their lives upon. White Superioity. They can not allow Obama to succeed or it would destroy their very core being.. Most Republicans would easily admit Bush* was not such a success but they can NEVER Admit a Black man can do a better job of Governing the country than they can.. NEVER NEVER NEVER..../
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. i don't think it is so much a black man
but a democrat. when in power, the republicans came up with lots of ideas but never really acted on them. it took a democrat (bill clinton) to act upon many of their ideas and some of them actually worked.

remember that one of the ideas that they constantly railed upon was the old line item veto. clinton acted upon it. yes, it was found to be unconstitutional but still.

abortion rights. republicans had the power from all branches for 8 years but never acted upon it. thier ideas keep the base happy and then they blame the opposition for not getting them acted upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Clinton did not act upon it, it was in their Contract on America
Along with term Limits for Congress. Both were found unconstitutional. Every single President that has ever been has wanted line item veto. While they fought Clinton tooth and nail they did participate in many bipartisan bills.. With Obama it is different. They can not allow a single thing promoted by Obama to become law..It would invalidate their entire existence..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. After an upsetting conversation I had today, I was thinking the same thing you are.
It upsets me to no end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC