Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Richardson: Second Amendment "precious in the West"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:44 PM
Original message
Bill Richardson: Second Amendment "precious in the West"
I think Richardson was smart to pursue the health care angle in regards to the Virginia Tech shooting. Cho was a deeply disturbed young man, and he needed psychiatric intervention in a big way. Our system, unfortunately, let him down.

Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think gun buyers should have a six-month waiting period. And
assault rifles s/b outlawed for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What's an "assault rifle?"
If by "assault rifle" you mean full-auto military rifles, those guns have been tightly restricted in America since 1934. In some states, such as New York and Kansas, they're flat out illegal.

But if you were referring to semi-automatic firearms that some wonk decided were not suitable for "hunting and sporting purposes," then I strenuously disagree. Keep 'em legal or say goodbye to Democratic control of Congress in 2008.

And a six-month waiting period for a .22-caliber squirrel rifle? Please tell me you're joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. check this link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Your wiki reference supports Derby, not the Brady Bunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. That definition only covers selective-fire rifles (full-auto)
Tightly regulated since 1934 under the National Firearms Act. Importation largely banned since 1968. All manufacture for the civilian market outlawed since 1986.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. These look pretty bad to me.
Assault weapons vs. Automatic weapons

Primarily limited to the United States, the term assault weapon is a political term, separate from the military definition, used to describe a variety of semi-automatic firearms that have certain features associated with military or police firearms. The 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired on September 13, 2004, defined the rifle type of assault weapon as a semiautomatic firearm with the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and two or more of the following:

* Folding or telescoping stock
* Conspicuous pistol grip
* Bayonet mount
* Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
* Grenade launcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yeah, all those really SCARY cosmetic features.
:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. My Remington Model 6 Pump Action 30-06 rifle
Edited on Thu Apr-26-07 09:59 PM by doc03
will make you just a dead as a so-called assault rifle.

A folding or telescoping stock doesn't make a gun more dangerous, I guess it would be a little
more concealable.

A conspicuous pistol grip doesn't either.

Who the hell ever kills anyone with a bayonet, even in the military?

I could put a flash suppressor on my rifle if I wanted to.

When was the last time anyone ever used a grenade launcher in a shooting?

I have multiple detachable magazines and a pump action will fire just as many aimed shots as a semi-auto and an expert can actually fire more shots with a pump action than a semi-auto.

Also a .223 M16 is a popgun compared to a 30-06.

Oh, I forgot I have a telescopic sight and can separate you from your head at 200 yards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Try applying your logic to abortion...its doesn't make any sense there either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't understand. What do guns purchases have to do with abortions? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Actually not that much. There's no Constitutional right to an abortion.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. There's no constitutional right to guns. Muskets, yes. Guns, no. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. A musket is a gun.
Sorry to pee on your parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. that's funny stuff. Keep 'em coming. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. The are both recognized rights
If its okay to massively delay or prohibitively tax, or others effectively deny one right, all the rest are seriously devalued.



I'm very pro choice, that includes abortion and guns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. mental health care is always at the bottom----funded low-maybe 6 visits or pass the pills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. My thought. Saturday Night Specials have nothing to do with "the west".
These fuckers need to quit pandering to the NRA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree with you here
"Saturday night specials" are made of cheap materials, are usually quite inaccurate even at close range, sometimes fall apart after only a few firings, and pose a danger to the shooter as well as to everyone around the shooter.

They are clearly not the sort of weapons that "a well-regulated milita" with an ounce of self-respect would even consider using.

Now, a decent 1911 pistol from Colt or S&W, on the other hand - that's a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. I'm told by people who live out in the boonies
that handguns are great for dispatching rattlers in the yard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. As a "gun enthusiast," I'd like to say...
please don't shoot the rattlesnakes. Leave them alone, and they'll go hide. Or call in someone who can safely catch them and take them where they won't get into trouble. Some species are getting very scarce!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Richardson just said Democrats should "stop using gun control as a litmus test"
Just said it to Tucker Carlson. Way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's right. And it's preciious in the South, the Northwest and Southwest.
The easiest way to keep the White House in GOP hands is to hammer on law-abiding gun owners. I know some of you don't like to hear it, but ignore the fact at your peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yes, that is a point lost on many for whatever reason....
We need to get God, Guns, and Gays out of the debate.... The pugs live to react to to anything related to them...

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Where's LaPerrer These Days?
The head of the NRA...Wayne LaPerrier <sp>...after Columbine, you couldn't get away from the guy and the vitriol he and others threw at the Democrats and Gore in those days were damaging. But where is he now? I haven't seen any NRA mouthpiece out there in the wake of the VT tragedy. What's more interesting was a report I heard where the NRA has privately reached out to Democrats since they see several areas of common cause...and that they feel ignored by the Repugnicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I don't know anything about that but I despise the NRA, never was a member
and I've owned guns for 58 years. I will give them up at the exact moment when every other American does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agree with Richardson.
Essentially, tighten up the loopholes regarding the mentally ill.

I question; At where do we differentiate the degree of mental illness? What if someone is on Trazadone or Prozac, one of the mild anti-depressants for say, post a divorce or menopause, something non-threatening essentially...Does that exclude them from ever purchasing a gun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I think ATF Form 4473 covers that fairly well
You are disqualified from purchasing or owning a firearm if you are addicted to or illegally using any controlled substance. Someone who has a legitimate prescription for a Schedule II drug such as fentanyl or methylphenidate can still legally purchase a firearm as long as their use of the drug is not regarded by the court system as addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Thanks.
Where can I learn more about this? I'm curious about how they define the mental health drugs and psychiatric treatment and/or hospitalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. 2,847...
...votes.

That was Jon Tester's margin of victory in 2006 Montana Senate race. Without that victory the U.S. Senate would be controlled by the Republicans.

If a candidate is not unconditionally pro-gun they don't have a chance in the rural west. That's just the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. But, but...he supports the Second Amendment! He must be a GOP mole!
Or maybe he represents his constituents. What a radical concept. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, Bill went with the correct take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. I was surprised to hear that he was the NRA's fave..
on either side. I think that we need careful background checks, tracking of guns used in crimes, a crackdown on the black market, licensing, and in urban areas we need purchase limits per month. I'm for gun control that I think will at least help keep guns out of the hands of criminals. I would prefer there be no guns, but in our culture, a complete ban would not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC