Paul Krugman: What We Learned From the Health Care Summit
If we’re lucky, Thursday’s summit will turn out to have been the last act in the great health reform debate, the prologue to passage of an imperfect but nonetheless history-making bill. If so, the debate will have ended as it began: with Democrats offering moderate plans that draw heavily on past Republican ideas, and Republicans responding with slander and misdirection — (they) didn’t bother making a case that could withstand even minimal fact-checking. Right off the bat Sen. Lamar Alexander delivered a whopper, asserting that under the Democratic plan, “for millions of Americans, premiums will go up.” But (according to the C.B.O.) the “price of a given amount of insurance coverage” would fall, not rise. (And he) declared that reconciliation has “never been used for something like this.” But reconciliation was used to push through both of the Bush tax cuts at a budget cost of $1.8 trillion, twice the bill for health reform. In reality, House Republicans don’t have anything to offer to Americans with troubled medical histories. Their big idea — allowing unrestricted competition across state lines — would lead to a race to the bottom. The states with the weakest regulations would set the standards for the nation as a whole. While some people would gain insurance, the people losing insurance would be those who need it most.
Republican politicians obviously believe that they can blandly make utterly misleading assertions, saying things that can be easily refuted, and pay no price. But Democrats can have the last laugh. All they have to do — and they have the power to do it — is finish the job, and enact health reform.more:
http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=1082414http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/opinion/26krugman.html