|
Several times in the last day or so, we have been shown pictures and have heard about how the military in Chile is trying to maintain order by stopping looters..
maintain order? really?
Order in a calamitous aftermath like those people are enduring?
It would seem to me that governments would be money ahead if they aided people to get what they needed in the aftermath, and then reimbursed the merchants. It;s very likely that their stores & merchandise were damaged as well, and at the very least, the lack of electricity would surely spoil everything perishable and create a mold/health issue that would cost them money and time cleaning up later anyway... so why not encourage "foraging" in the time-frame where no real aid is coming anyway?
In a place like Chile, with its past history with all things military, it would seem that having armed military roaming around intimidating people would be about the worst thing they could do.
There will always be the knuckleheads who will take tvs & furniture, but if the police & military were supervising, instead of chasing these people down, maybe that would be lessened too..
People who are hungry, thirsty, or who have children in need , will do whatever is necessary to fill those needs...so if it means they "loot", they will do it, especially if there is little or no aid available.
Following a devastating disaster, people will automatically change their thinking, and will concentrate on their own interests and those of their immediate families.. It's not unusual or odd to go into "survival mode".
Instead of having military guard damaged stores full of rotting food, maybe their assistance would be needed elsewhere..
|