The Rude Pundit: The Dogs Will Eat You Because They Are Dogs

[meegbear]

In personal conversations, there's few things that set the Rude Pundit off than what happens when some seemingly normal people talk about their pets. Usually, after describing the adorable shit their dogs do, they will say something like, "Yeah, my dog is my child." And then they'll add, "I mean, really, if you think about it, it's just like having a child, except less expensive." That's followed by a laugh, like they just said the most obvious thing.

When the Rude Pundit hears this, it pisses him off. He's a dog lover, sure, but he'll say, "No, your dog is your dog. It's a dog. You know how you tell the difference between your dog and a child? If you're locked in your apartment with them and you die, your dog will eat you. Your child won't." Replace "dog" with "cat," and it's the same answer.

In other words, no matter how much you love or care for your dog or cat, you don't know what it's thinking. You impose your human frame of reference on them, but at the same time, Fido is putting you into his canine one. And you are always just one can of Alpo away from becoming meat.

When the Rude Pundit read this week about the explosion of right wing extremist groups, he thought, "It's sad, really, how quickly an animal will turn when it panics." According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, "Hate groups stayed at record levels — almost 1,000 — despite the total collapse of the second largest neo-Nazi group in America. Furious anti-immigrant vigilante groups soared by nearly 80%, adding some 136 new groups during 2009." This is not to mention the 512 "active" Patriot Groups, which foster antigovernment conspiracy theories and stand around bragging about how armed they are, like the Oath Keepers, which may just be a new peak of sublimated homoeroticism, a kind of gun fetish mixed with cock worship.

See, the reason they and the Tea Party are the dogs is because they have made the leap to wanting to overthrow the government if things don't go their way. They don't want to work within the existing American system. Because if their worst fears come true, and America becomes socialist, it will be because our elected representatives voted for it, not because it was done at the point of a gun. When George W. Bush was wrecking the nation, left wing groups talked in terms of organization for elections or of impeachment. These groups talk in terms of armed resistance. And we're here, in terms of our increasingly unhinged right wing nutzoids, after only a year of the Obama presidency. When people turned to revolutionary or radical acts in the past, it was after years of war or centuries of mistreatment and the failure of any systemic means of solving the problems. In other words, these people in all these extremist groups are greedy, selfish pussies who want what they want now and don't want to do the hard work to get there.

We could say they are delusional. We could say that they are victims of the cruel capitalist system that has only gotten crueler in the three decades. We could say they have been manipulated by a media that feeds off their fear.

Instead, as Mother Jones magazine says, they are flirting with actual, honest-to-god treason. Once you start talking about overthrowing the government through any means but elections, you have ceased to part of the conversation. Actual patriotism is believing that the American form of government can work, even if that is slow and frustrating. If you don't like it, then amend the Constitution to change the way the country works. Elect people who support you. Then, if that doesn't happen, you might want to consider other means. It takes some time, not one year after the black dude was inaugurated.

But, really, motherfuckers? Guns? And those, like Michelle Bachmann and Jim DeMint, who fan their flames are privileged enablers who will run away like panicked kittens as soon as the dogs tear into the body.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

[FSogol]

1. K & R. n/t

[gratuitous]

2. Nicely nut-shelled by the Rude Pundit

There has been no small amount of discussion here about making common cause with some elements of the groups mentioned by the Rude Pundit. While some of their concerns sound similar to ours, we part ways early when it comes to addressing those concerns. Indeed, liberals and progressives try to work within the system - almost to a fault - to redress government ineptitude. For example, Sen. Lincoln of Arkansas, a particularly odious Democrat, right now is facing a big primary challenge from Ed Halter. We'll be more than happy to make Ms. Lincoln the ex-Senator from Arkansas.

The likes of the Tea Baggers and Oath Keepers don't believe in or trust the American system. They believe in the power of violence, and turn to it at the earliest opportunity. President Obama hadn't even been inaugurated when these people began their threats to use violence, and it hasn't slowed at all in the 14 months since. We cannot ally with these people until they give up their violent rhetoric.

[Bitwit1234]

3. And make no mistake Bachmann and DeMint are nuts and

very delusional...and they get the support of other nuts.