Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stark booted as chair of Ways and Means

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:46 AM
Original message
Stark booted as chair of Ways and Means

Second Ways and Means boss ousted; Levin replaces Stark
By Jay Heflin - 03/04/10 09:57 AM ET

Rep. Sandy Levin (D-Mich.) will be the acting chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced to her caucus on Thursday.

The startling announcement comes a day after Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) appeared ready to take the reins of the committee from Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.).

Stark was the next in line for the post in terms of seniority, but some panel members recoiled at the idea of his leading the committee. Stark is known for making controversial and eccentric remarks, and in 2007 he apologized on the House floor for comments about President George W. Bush and the Iraq War.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who serves on the panel and in leadership as Assistant to the Speaker, acknowledged there had been "lively discussions" on Wednesday about the initial decision to have Stark bcome acting chairman.

<snip>

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/84943-democrats-to-continue-lively-discussion-over-ways-and-means-leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. predicted right here on the DU
epic fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, we wouldn't want to have anybody with a spine in that position, would we
WTF is it with the Democrats that they are so afraid of anybody who actually has an opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You wanted the guy who apologized to Bush?
How is that having a spine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Actually I wanted the guy who called the gop congressman a little punk
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/84829-new-ways-and-committees-chairman-has-history-of-gaffes

A link to some of Stark's greatest hits (they call them "gaffes").

BTW, I don't think he apologized to Bush. IIRC, he apologized to the families of service members for his remarks about sending soldiers to Iraq.

He may be a bit bombastic but he's a refreshing change from the nicey nicey image the Dems have gotten tagged with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sandy's my rep
He'll do a great job, and he's as clean as a whistle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's always been sort of brash
It's not surprising they wouldn't want him to take the lead, they want to avoid having to do damage control in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't think the PTB would tolerate Stark
because he's far too sensible about things. They wanted someone else they could control and there's no controlling a Congressman with the guts to admit he's an atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was excited for about a day.
Stark would have been great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Stark and Levin are both in their late 70s -- Don't we have any young leadership?
The place seems to be run by a lot of old fossils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Seniority - and W and M is run by old bulls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. classic move by the party of handwringers..
and totally predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sandy Levin is really good.
My Rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Move along... nothing to see here...
Nothing to worry about, rich folks, all is well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. So if seniority
is no longer important what about a feeble attempt at ethnic balance and competence in leadership positions? I liked Pete Stark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. The pukes bitch and POOF! Presto change-o. No more Pete Stark.
Gee. What the heck is a majority party to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC