|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:18 PM Original message |
Massa: stepping down. They say it's good news for health reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. He was a "No" vote on Healthcare reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The article points out that it's good news for Nancy Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Please see post #9 below. I put it in the wrong place. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cutlassmama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. then it's a good thing he's leaving. Too bad about the cancer though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I assume you are aware that Massa was/is against the bill because - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. If I remember my parliamentary procedure.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Why not.? Most everyone at DU was against the reform bill before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Stupak voted for the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. While he's not much of a loss to any of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Oh Dear God, That Was YOU?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. "he's not much of a loss to any of us" - Please speak for yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. I can't imagine what he could have said that made a CPO feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. Now we just have to kick Kucinich and Artur Davis to the curb and then we only need 215 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tmyers09 (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. You have to be being sarcastic about the first one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. That depends on whether or not you like the current bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. I heard that they were considering him a 'possible' yes, because even though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. Eric was never afraid to stand up for the people against powerful interests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. +1,000. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't think this is good for Pelosi. He would have ultimately voted Yea even though he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-05-10 05:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Sad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
21. BAD news for health care reform, good news for Insurance Profits Protection Act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kudzu22 (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. +1 he was forced out by Rahm for voting no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC