Why we will never see a public option and why Social Security and Medicare will be "privatized" too.

Nikki Stone1

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Mar-07-10 05:20 PM
Original message

Why we will never see a public option and why Social Security and Medicare will be "privatized" too.

Straightforward article. Read it. And remember Peter Peterson, good friend of Robert Rubin and all his acolyte.

http://www.counterpunch.org/brown03022010.html

What Goes Around Comes Around

IMF-Style Austerity Comes to America

By ELLEN BROWN

When billionaires pledge a billion dollars to educate people to the evils of something, it is always good to peer closely at what they are up to. Hedge fund magnate Peter G. Peterson was formerly Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations and head of the New York Federal Reserve. He is now senior chairman of Blackstone Group, which is in charge of dispersing government funds in the controversial AIG bailout, widely criticized as a government giveaway to banks. Peterson is also founder of the Peter Peterson Foundation, which has adopted the cause of imposing �fiscal responsibility� on Congress. He hired David M. Walker, former head of the Government Accounting Office, to spearhead a massive campaign to reduce the runaway federal debt, which the Peterson/Walker team blames on reckless government and consumer spending. The Foundation funded the movie �I.O.U.S.A.� to amass popular support for their cause, which largely revolves around dismantling Social Security and Medicare benefits as a way to cut costs and return to �fiscal responsibility.�

The Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform has pushed heavily for action to stem the federal debt. Bills for a budget task force were sponsored in both houses of Congress. The Senate bill was narrowly defeated, and the House bill was tabled; but that was not the end of it. In Obama�s State of the Union speech on January 27, he said he would be creating a presidential budget task force by executive order to address the federal government�s deficit and debt crisis, and that the task force would be modeled on the bills Congress had failed to pass. If Congress would not impose �fiscal responsibility� on the nation, the President would. �It keeps me awake at night, looking at all that red ink,� he said. The Executive Order was signed on February 17.
....

That raises the question, are the advocates of �fiscal responsibility� merely misguided? Or are they up to something more devious? The President�s Executive Order is vague about the sorts of budget decisions being entertained, but we can get a sense of what is on the table by looking at the earlier agenda of Peterson�s Commission on Budget Reform. The Peterson/Walker plan would have slashed social security entitlements, at a time when Wall Street has destroyed the home equity and private retirement accounts of potential retirees. Worse, it would have increased the social security tax, disguised as a �mandatory savings tax.� This added tax would be automatically withdrawn from your paycheck and deposited to a �Guaranteed Retirement Account� managed by the Social Security Administration. Since the savings would be �mandatory,� you could not withdraw your money without stiff penalties; and rather than enjoying an earlier retirement paid out of your increased savings, a later retirement date was being called for. In the meantime, your �mandatory savings� would just be fattening the investment pool of the Wall Street bankers managing the funds...

...All of this puts �fiscal responsibility� in a different light. Rather than saving the future for our grandchildren, as the President himself seems to think it means, it appears to be a code word for delivering public monies into private hands and raising taxes on the already-squeezed middle class. In the parlance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), these are called �austerity measures,� and they are the sorts of things that people are taking to the streets in Greece, Iceland and Latvia to protest. Americans are not taking to the streets only because nobody has told us that is what is being planned.

We have been deluded into thinking that �fiscal responsibility� (read �austerity�) is something for our benefit, something we actually need in order to save the country from bankruptcy. In the massive campaign to educate us to the perils of the federal debt, we have been repeatedly warned that the debt is disastrously large; that when foreign lenders decide to pull the plug on it, the U.S. will have to declare bankruptcy; and that all this is the fault of the citizenry for borrowing and spending too much. We are admonished to tighten our belts and save more; and since we can�t seem to impose that discipline on ourselves, the government will have to do it for us with a �mandatory savings� plan. The American people, who are already suffering massive unemployment and cutbacks in government services, will have to sacrifice more and pay the piper more, just as in those debt-strapped countries forced into austerity measures by the IMF.....