|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 04:01 AM Original message |
Is there anyone here who has actually seen The Hurt Locker who thinks it's a pro-war movie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galileoreloaded (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Not pro-war and frankly not a realistic depiction either. But a pretty good story none the less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. it absolutely is NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The funny thing is, it was written by the same guy as In The Valley of Elah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. Some guy on some blog somewhere on the internet says it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. I've seen it and it's a shit movie. I served in the army in the first gulf war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Thnk you for your insight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Who thinks THL is pro-war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just read these threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChoppinBroccoli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. I Saw The Movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justanaverageguy (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. I didn't think it was one way or the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
10. I never heard of it until I watched the Oscars... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not necessarily pro/anti war, but it was certainly pro-military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I didn't see it that way at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Not pro-war. It's about men doing life and death work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's vaguely pro-war. Mostly neutral. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. you missed the point ENTIRELY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Right. He's an adrenaline junkie. He probably drinks mountain dew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. I Don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brooklyns_Finest (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. It certainly was not Anti-War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
20. Haven't seen it, sorry. Have no desire to either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. I guess I'm going to see both. Hollywood wins. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC