Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashburn: "I am gay."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:28 PM
Original message
Ashburn: "I am gay."
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 01:29 PM by DirkGently
Well that's that, at least. Still defending his voting record as "representing his constituents" apparently. Can "re-hab" be far behind?

"I am gay. And so, those are the words that have been so difficult for me for so long," Ashburn told radio host Inga Banks on her show on the KERN station in Bakersfield. (snip)

"I felt my duty, and I still fell this way, is to represent my constituents," Ashburn said, adding later that "I don't think it's something that has affected or will affect how I do my job."


Edit: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=58665
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, your reprsenttaives want you to be a dick?
Well, then you're doing a good job, although I doubt the ads he ran for election said, "Vote for me, I'll be a dick."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there a hypocrisy gene?
One wonders.... (and it must be close to the gene allele for authoritarian personality)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. What's 'hypocrisy?'

Doesn't seem like even bothers anyone anymore. A quick search suggests Asburn's orientation was widely known. I'll bet a fair proportion of his conservative colleagues even knew.

I don't know how someone does that either, but it seems the entire idea of arguing from an honest perspective has lost all importance. Politicians and even everday people just pick an ideology, slap on a bumper sticker, and *intentionally do not think* about whether what they are saying has any relation to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's bad enough to vote anti-gay
but the idea that he was a major leader of the anti-gay caucus and simultaneously gay himself...it just strains credulity to say that his own homosexuality did not affect the way he did his job.

i think this was the kind of thing David Brock was talking about in his book a while back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I may be an armchair psychologist but he sounds like a classic self-loather.
And believe me, I attended a born-again church for a long time and realized that was the norm for that place, I
know their type pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess my question
would be, why would he want to represent these homophobic right wingers? I can't believe everyone in Bakersfield is that way but his voting record suggests different.

It would be like me going to Mississippi and continually voting for anti-choice legislation because that's waht my constituents want. I don't think I could live with myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. proof that it's never too late
to drink and drive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. KamaAina: "Well, DUH!!"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does it occur to Mr. Ashburn?
That the constituents he has so zealously represented - against his own personal interest - are a big part of the reason he was unable to live his life with honesty and integrity? That in endorsing their bigotry with his representation, he made his own life more miserable? And does he have any regard whatsoever for other gay men and women who don't have the resources he does in dealing with the hatred?

He's still new at this living outside the closet thing. I hope he is able to come to terms with his quisling ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's going to go over like a lead balloon in Bakersfield!
Bakersfield is about as red as you can get in CA. The Bakersfield Californian endorsed Bush twice. I got some letters to the editor printed and they were saved by the local UU church since liberal letters were so rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. You can't be disingenuous and represent anyone
It wasn't all about his constituents, Ashburn was battling himself. He had no problem voting for a tax hike, even though his very conservative district was opposed to it, he certainly wasn't voting their will then. He wanted to try and pretend to be something he wasn't, it's as simple as that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC