|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:11 PM Original message |
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.): "Premature" to allow gays in military. "Exhaustive study" needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. Give me a break !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Aren't these people ashamed to say something ssooo stupid!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Next step: After said "exhaustive study" takes place, complain of onerous big government rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. and just how does expect to study this unless it is first allowed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. shameless clueless homophobe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. That man is so full of shit he must have to wear earplugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. Premature" to allow balck and white mixed units in military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
951-Riverside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. Baloney. They're going to allow gays so they can bring back the draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. THat is why conservadems and "conservatives" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Um, where the hell did THAT come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. As long as money exists, there will be ways to dodge the draft. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WVRICK13 (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. How About An Exhaustive Study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. Maybe it's going to take a mass outing by all . . . and I mean all . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. And DADT isn't having an impact on readiness, retention and recruitment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. I am so fucking sick of that man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. Exhaustive? Issue the damn order and let the personnel deal with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. There's no "order" to issue, we need to pass a law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. Arkana (D-Mass): "Premature" to give Ben Nelson another Senate term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Perfect response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. so, is this "premature" ejaculation on Nelson's part indicative of his problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. Exhaustive study? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
21. Typical of too many of this Party's leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NRaleighLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. Just thinking of that DINO makes me exhausted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
23. Liar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
26. Nelson/Stupak et al - Democrats that make some Republicans look liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. I volunteer t o do the study! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. Is there a GOP talking point that Ben Nelson WON'T subscribe to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC