While Dems are bitchin' and griping and eating their own, threatening to sit out the 2010 and 2012 elections 'cause Obama didn't deliver, the sinister powers that be on the right are strategically moving on.
If this article and its long term implications does not scare the heck out of folks and motivate them to focus on 2010 elections ~ or at least vote~ I honestly do not know what can.
**sigh**
I posted on the topic a while back. It sank like a rock with only two responses:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=4523438Perhaps it was too close following the elections for folks to be concerned. But now, November is just around the corner.
Uncharacteristic post for me. Maybe I just got up on the wrong side of bed and opened my email to this (from DGA):
Friend-
"He who controls redistricting can control Congress." -Karl Rove
I just got this article from a colleague and had to send it to you. It's the GOP's comeback plan, from none other than Karl Rove himself.
Backroom power-players like Rove know every loophole and trick in the book when it comes to bypassing voters to seize power.
Remember 1994? The GOP manipulated the congressional redistricting process, snatched up 34 seats, and used their new majority to obstruct progress and smash their disastrous agenda through Congress.
Twisting the political process -- all in the name of taking back power -- is what Republicans do best.
But their plan hinges on one thing: electing GOP governors. In almost every state, the governor has influence over this critical process and the Republicans know they MUST win enough statehouses in November for their underhanded plan to succeed...
Here's Rove's latest hit piece. Is it a fair warning or a veiled threat?
The GOP Targets State Legislatures
He who controls redistricting can control Congress.
The political world is fixated on whether this year's elections will deliver an epic rebuke of President Barack Obama and his party. If that happens, it could end up costing Democrats congressional seats for a decade to come.
Some of the most important contests this fall will be way down the ballot in communities like Portsmouth, Ohio and West Lafayette, Ind., and neighborhoods like Brushy Creek in Round Rock, Texas, and Murrysville Township in Westmoreland County, Pa. These are state legislative races that will determine who redraws congressional district lines after this year's census, a process that could determine which party controls upwards of 20 seats and whether many other seats will be competitive.
Next year, legislatures in the 44 states with more than one congressional seat will adjust their districts' boundaries to account for changes in population.
Some 18 state legislatures could have an additional task. As many as 10 states will have to combine districts as they lose House seats. Eight states are expected to gain at least one seat each.
~snip~
Control of the state legislature matters whether a state loses or gains seats. Take fast-growing Texas, which is expected to pick up as many as four seats next year. Democrats had a 17-13 edge in the state's congressional delegation after the 2000 elections. Republicans won control of the Texas House in 2002 and redrew the state's congressional map. As a result, the GOP now controls 20 congressional seats in Texas while Democrats control 12. Similarly in Georgia, following the 2000 census Democrats redrew district lines to give themselves control of the state's two new congressional seats.
~snip~
Republican strategists are focused on 107 seats in 16 states. Winning these seats would give them control of drawing district lines for nearly 190 congressional seats. Six of these states are projected to pick up a total of nine seats, and five are expected to lose a combined six seats.
Nationally, the GOP's effort will be spearheaded by the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC). Funded by 80,000 donors, it spent more than $20 million in the last election cycle on legislative races and for attorney general, lieutenant governor and secretary of state campaigns.
~snip~
http://www.rove.com/articles/219