Should the President's Chief of Staff lobby while naked?

[undeterred]

Poll question: Should the President's Chief of Staff lobby while naked?

[rug]

1. Depends on his staff.

[CatWoman]

2. and his chief

:)

[Robb]

3. I see no reason to even ATTEMPT to top this response. nt

[gateley]

7. +1. And the picture is just perfect. nt

[onehandle]

4. Whatever gets us HCR. nt

[dflprincess]

18. If Rahm is doing the lobbying - it's not FOR health care reform. n/t

[Turbineguy]

5. If he lobbies

but doesn't grope, he'll get nowhere with the repubs.

[Wwagsthedog]

6. Yes, it's undignified

Suits him perfectly!

[mod mom]

8. + 1. Obama could have done SO much better.

rahm is more thug than diplomat.

[Jackpine Radical]

11. At least since the Nixon administration, there has been little difference.

[Jackpine Radical]

9. Only if he actually does it in the lobby.

[sharesunited]

10. If they have nothing to hide.

[skids]

12. He can't help the way he was born.

Lobbying is just in his genetics... :hide:

[Electric Monk]

13. Exclusively

in Rahm's case

[Canuckistanian]

14. The problem isn't HOW he lobbies, it's WHO he lobbies

Fr'instance, did Rahm poke BEN friggin' NELSON in the chest in the showers?

How about Bart Stupak or Max Baucus? No?

Of course not. Rahm only applies the wet digit to those with PROGRESSIVE ideals.

[KansDem]

15. It would make LBJ's approach much easier...

If you've got 'em by the balls, their heart and mind will follow.

[UTUSN]

16. We Dems need to maximize our resources and stop being WIMPS!1 n/t

[Bitwit1234]

17. I know what he can do....get Scott Brown the nudeo expert to lobby with him.

[Catshrink]

19. Naked or fully clothed he's still a little prick.

[unkachuck]

20. other....

....ONLY without a hard-on....

[TexasObserver]

21. If he's up for it ....

[old mark]

22. Certainly - it proves he has nothing to hide.

No big thing...


mark