Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is most responsible for no Public Option in Bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:09 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who is most responsible for no Public Option in Bill?
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 06:14 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
In the current competitive ass-covering by Pelosi and the Senate I tend to Nancy's side. I think it is easy to say you support the PO when you know it won't be in the bill but that Nancy has it on good authority (Reid) that the PO would fail in the Senate, or at least risk failing enough to make it too dangerous to include. In other words, there are 50 votes for the PO in the senate when there's no risk of an actual PO vote, but not 50 real votes.

But I can see the other side's points also. (That there is no reason to defer to the realities of a bill that got 60 votes in a process where 60 are not required)

Who is most responsible for the fact that there will not be a PO in the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Democratic Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. You need another choice.
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 06:13 PM by Cleita
Zeke Emmanuel, Rahm's doctor brother and Obama's health care advisor. This is exactly the plan Zeke has proposed even before Obama was elected and he wants no publicly funded medical care whatsoever other than subsidies for the poor. He wants to end Medicare too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That would probably go under "and/or WH"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its Obama
No more excuses folks. If he had led the charge from day one for public option it would be in there. But he was silent or gave mixed signals all the time so no public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not sure if the votes would've been there
but it would've been nice to see Obama and his team fight for the PO more aggressively. I think this fight begins and ends with Obama with help from Congress. I don't think neither branch fought hard enough for the PO, despite maybe not having the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yep
Obama should have led the charge instead of a hands off policy, it would have been a much better shot in any case for public option win or lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. We had bills with a public option
They were ripped apart before they had the slightest chance of moving forward. Congratalations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks!
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 07:03 PM by bigwillq
Because we all know that I am a member of Congress and a part of the White House staff! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hey. The left didn't want any last year's bills
and guess what, we aren't getting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. And this is my fault, how?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You got what you wanted
What's the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I want a health care reform bill
So, no, I haven't gotten it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Not even Kennedy's bill was good enough
Not even when a good public option was added to it. The carping continued until we're stuck with leftovers. That's what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Good enough for whom?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Playing dumb now. cya n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Naw, but your generalization
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 07:33 PM by bigwillq
and your judgments aren't much better than the "D" word you just used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Per the New York Times, it came from the top in '09
"Hospital industry lobbyists, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of alienating the White House, say they negotiated their $155 billion in concessions with Mr. Baucus and the administration in tandem. House staff members were present, including for at least one White House meeting, but their role was peripheral, the lobbyists said.

Several hospital lobbyists involved in the White House deals said it was understood as a condition of their support that the final legislation would not include a government-run health plan paying Medicare rates — generally 80 percent of private sector rates — or controlled by the secretary of health and human services.

“We have an agreement with the White House that I’m very confident will be seen all the way through conference,” one of the industry lobbyists, Chip Kahn, director of the Federation of American Hospitals, told a Capitol Hill newsletter. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/health/policy/13health.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. In Other Words
The Obama white house sold the working people down the river when it comes to meaningful health care reform.

Sold us out to the fat cat crooked corporations.

they are offering us health care "reform"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. lve it's the chicken shits in the Senate. I don't blame Pelosi
for not trusting them to vote for a bill if the House puts a PO in it. Far too many Senators have said things in the past & ended up changing their minds. I heard the guy on Ed's show yesterday naming the Sens he spoke to that vowed they would vote yea, but I don't trust them either. If they really have the votes in the Senate for a PO, let THEM put it in the reconciliation bill & let the House revote on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would have to go with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Senate, mostly. But also the left
Because you just couldn't be satisfied with the bill we had last summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Suddenly, last summer.
The White House was conspicuously quiet during the august swift-boating of HCR, and HCR sank in the polls after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama because we already knew Congress didn't give a shit about us
Its really disappointing to find out that Obama doesn't want to fight either. But he was a Senator so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Max Baucus
however you spell his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC