|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:47 PM Original message |
Some "Fox journalists" worried Beck "undermines their credibility" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. Uh guys, the "credibility" ship sailed away a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChicagoSuz219 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. You took the words right out of my mouth! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last_Stand (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. fox has journalists? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:52 PM Original message |
or credibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Urinalists ...attending the bathrooms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Relax, folks. You can't lose what you never had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robeson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. What credibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. Fox has "journalists?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Astrad (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Some humans worried Beck undermines their credibility as an intelligent species. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well, at least they have a sense of humor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Fox journalists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarcoated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. They've created a wingnut Frankenstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't see any worries because Fox does not have any journalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. You have properly placed the quotes in the right place in your post's headline. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. FOX has credibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. They have the data to show it too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. "Fair and Balanced" is what ruined their credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
16. Good grief, the irony is thick with this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. Perhaps we have been going about this wrong. What if all of us watched Glenn Beck. Only Glenn Beck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. They truly do reside on a separate plane from ours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
20. Oh, NOW they're worried? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester Messiah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. Wow. That's like the Klan worrying that someone makes them look too racist. [nt] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Take a stand then. State on your shows that you do not endorse Glenn beck or his psychotic rantings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
23. LOL. Don't worry Fox, you don't have to worry. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. now THAT is funny! I don't care who the hell you are. That's just plain funny right there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hvn_nbr_2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. BREAKING NEWS: Cesspool offended by crap in its midst. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. No need to worry about something you never had ...you asscarrots! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
28. WHAT credibility? Never had it, never will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
29. There are Fox News Journalists with "Credibility"? That in itself is news to me. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. It's like a skunk complaining about a polecat. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
31. Boy nothing gets by them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. What credibility? They didn't have any to start with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wow, The Irony Is Strong With This One... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. "FOX journalists" - an oxymoron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-16-10 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
35. The word "FOX" undermines their credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-16-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
36. Stop worrying, Fox "journalists." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-16-10 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
37. I got as far as "(Faux) journalists" and burst into laughter!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC