Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two charges dropped against Lt. Watada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:55 AM
Original message
Two charges dropped against Lt. Watada
Two Watada charges dropped
Iraq war resister's possible court-martial sentence cut to 4 years

By MIKE BARBER
P-I REPORTER

A week before the court-martial of 1st Lt. Ehren Watada is to begin, the Army has dropped two charges of conduct unbecoming an officer, Fort Lewis officials and Watada's supporters said Monday.

The dismissal means Watada now could face a maximum of four years in prison if convicted instead of six. It also means two reporters subpoenaed to testify about statements Watada made in interviews with them will not be called.

Watada, 28, an artillery officer, is facing a court-martial as the only military officer to refuse deployment to Iraq with Fort Lewis' 4,000member Stryker Brigade last summer. Watada has called the war illegal and immoral and says international conventions and Army policies require him as an officer to refuse unlawful orders.

Watada has refused conscientious-objector status, saying he is not against war in general. He has said he would fight in Afghanistan.

Joe Piek, a Fort Lewis press spokesman, said Watada signed a stipulation-of-fact to the authenticity of statements he has made in exchange for the government's agreeing to dismiss two counts of conduct unbecoming. Each carried a maximum term of one-year confinement.

By signing the stipulation, Army prosecutors no longer had to subpoena the reporters, Piek said.

Watada faces one count of missing movement with his unit to Iraq and two of conduct unbecoming an officer for public statements he made to the media and at a Veterans for Peace national convention in Seattle last summer.

In a news release, Watada's lead lawyer, Eric Seitz of Hawaii said, "By agreeing beforehand to all of the facts the government would ask of the subpoenaed reporters, Lieutenant Watada shielded these journalists from the heavy-handedness of the government."

Seitz said, "While we don't think any charges should have been filed at all for simply exercising free speech, we are pleased with the government's willingness to reduce Lieutenant Watada's potential sentence by two years."

Watada, meanwhile, has become a focus for the anti-war movement as activists prepare for his court-martial, which is scheduled to begin Monday. Demonstrators are expected to gather outside Fort Lewis during the proceedings.

Watada made an appearance over the weekend at several peace events in and around Seattle. A week before, after Watada lost in a military court several free-speech inspired motions to put the legality of the war on trial in his defense, a "citizens panel" at The Evergreen State College's Tacoma campus convened over that issue.

P-I reporter Mike Barber can be reached at 206-448-8018 or mikebarber@seattlepi.com.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/301650_watada30.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Instead of facing imprisonment, Watada should be given a medal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. He shouldn't have to face ANY charges.
He believes (as do most of us) the war in Iraq is illegal & he is correct to refuse unlawful orders. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would that he could state his case
about the ILLEGALITY of the INVASION! GOOO EHREN!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Unfortunately there is no way that he will not receive
a Dishonorable Discharge and Prison time. The Iraq Invasion will not be declared Illegal by a Military Court. That would mean every US Service member could bring forth that case and leave Iraq. I doubt if any Civilian Court would declare the Iraq Invasion illegal either. It is a sad situation but reality will prevail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. More guts than everyone in the Pentagon combined
A soldier throws himself on a live grenade to save his buddies, and he gets a posthumous medal and hero's funeral. Lt. Watada throws himself at an unjust and illegal invasion/occupation to save thousands and thousands of his buddies and Iraqi civilians, and he gets a court martial.

Meanwhile, the big brass sits back and waits for their pensions to be vested, and only then after they retire do they speak out. Real gutsy, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder if they're trying to keep this from going to court...
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 07:39 PM by cynatnite
The conduct unbecoming charges will end an officer's career. Dropping them means he can stay in the service if he wants. Missing a troop movement can be pretty minimal...lose a pay grade, money and maybe locked up for a short time. The maximum is severe, but I'd have to look it up

If this did go to a court, even a military one, it puts the legality of the war on trial. I can see why the higher ups and politicians wouldn't want it to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PreacherCasey Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. From what I heard on NPR, the judge ruled that the legality of the war can NOT
be questioned. He ruled against the request of Watada's defense team to call witness who would call the legality of the war into question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PreacherCasey Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kick and Rec for a man with INTEGRITY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks for the information...I stand corrected
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. What a brave man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. What if the military
court upholds the Lt.'s contention? What if they decide that the war is indeed illegal? Can all the troops stop fighting and come home? Seriously, if the military wants out and simply can not take W as emperor anymore, why not just rule the war illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC