|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:54 PM Original message |
Dennis generously gives back money to FDL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. Unrec. He took that money under false pretenses. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. He changed his position AFTER all was lost for PO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Nonsense. If his vote didn't matter, he wouldn't have been strong-armed into selling out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. You don't know what they threatened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Right. But logically, it doesn't make sense to argue that Kuch's vote didn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. yes, yes. Obama threatened to kill dennis if he didn't vote his way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. For the sake of argument, let's pretend he was "threatened": so what? Why didn't this man of bold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Frankly, I'd like to see those making the claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. They won't: Dennis said it, and that's that. He's the E.F. Hutton of that tiny crowd. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
43. Sure I do, they didn't threaten shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. but his vote DID matter, as it turns out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Did Kucinich ask FDL to raise money for him? The first email from FDL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. He knew damn well that money was raised on the strength of his opposition to "HCR" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. That email was received Monday afternoon, maybe he had other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Really? Than what about the fundraising for Obama's campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. I guess 3% of liberals isn't a very good base, even for Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. FYI, the 3% meme has been debunked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, it hasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yes, it has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. No, it hasn't. Simply repeating information proven to be dated makes it no less dated. Try another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I guess I missed the part where you refuted anything I wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. It's not my problem that your eyes seem to go out of focus whenever they gaze at the replies that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Again, a comment with 0% substance or facts. Just cheap little jabs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. "You better hope I'm the only once (Sic) that notices" - LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. LOLOL! Desp. er. ation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I agree, using the 3% poll without the context of the prior poll IS desperation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
38. What's desperate is trying to use a poll from DECEMBER to counter a poll from last WEEK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Not when the polls are asking different questions. But you already knew that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. "Kucinich announced this morning that he'll vote yes for the Aetna-PhRMA bailout bill" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. They were frequent visitors and had front row seats in the discussions :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Aren't you one of the ones always screaming that people should "READ THE BILL!!!1!"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. Kabukicinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. Know he got screwed or assumed he got screwed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. Kucinich did the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. God bless DK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. You're welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. Your flexibility (reads blind spot) in reasoning is hilarious. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Thank you for kicking this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. Unrec for obvious reasons. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. But thank you for kicking it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
29. How was he screwed? He agreed to vote yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
39. Has anyone else ever done this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. So FDL gave 17k for this ONE specific vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Yep, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC