|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
begin_within (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:01 PM Original message |
Check in here if you're still against this bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm still against it for the reasons you cited plus the stupid mandate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm tired of it all. It's pointless back and forth (and I'm on your side) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. Still against the bill, the Dems had a real opportunity with two-thirds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. knr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. I am not in favor of the bill as it stands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Checking in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't support this insurance mandate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I think the bill is a good as the corporations will allow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. You just called it "shitty", and then said, in no uncertain terms, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. (facepainting david Puddy on Seinfeld) Ya gotta support the team |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 10:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. No, you do NOT have to "support the team"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. I agree with everything you posted in the reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thotzRthingz (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. count me AGAINST because I see no: "real public option, Medicare buy-in, or single payer" (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. This Bill Puts No Real Restrictions On Corporations While It Forces People To Pay Them Money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. i do not support the mandate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. Against it nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'm against the institutionalization of the health insurance industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. Fuck, fuck, FUCK THIS BILL. You know what this Democratic Congress reminds me of? I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merkins (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. &r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. Was against it before, still am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. Against n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
18. Still against this bonanza for insurance and pharmaceutical companies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eyerish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
19. Right here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
20. I still am against this bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. Here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Present. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
24. Honestly, I don't know if I'm against the current iteration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merkins (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. & r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hun Joro (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
29. Hello! K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luciferous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
30. I'm against it, mainly because of the mandate and the lack of a public option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
31. The "public option" is designed not to be real, so that's a non-starter for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
33. still against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
34. Very strongly opposed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
35. *cough* *cough* The Senate bill has Sanders' single-payer amendment *cough* *cough* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 02:09 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. What does that even mean to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 09:57 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. It means that the states can choose a single-payer system if they want to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Do you really think so? Well, it's possible. Anger at DC is mounting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
37. i don't support the excise tax, etc.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
40. Of course, for me it was never about DK...he's a politician and I hope he got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal_at_heart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
41. a mandate without a public option is a blank check for the insurance companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-18-10 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
42. Despite the layers of artfully applied lipstick, I'm still opposed to this pig of bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC