|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:01 PM Original message |
I can't support "deem and pass". Do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. I support it if it means getting HCR done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Unless it is illegal, it is game, any whining, is misplaced. Close that gap then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. it is an up or down vote. They merely combined 2 bills they were voting aye on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. If it's allowed in accordance with the rules of the House, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. they already fucking voted on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. The House already voted on the House bill but now they vote on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Passing this bill will not be winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Sez you anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Let's say it passes, everyone hates it, and the pukes say, "See what the Dems did?!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. Furthermore, do you avoid Uturns unless you have a sign that says you can? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. I find it interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I guess it just shows where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. It's not cheating, it's a way for folks to say they voted for the good parts of the Senate Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. adoption of the conference report is a parliamentary technique |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. What is the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4lbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
11. Who cares as long as it passes? 20 years from now, no one will care HOW it passes, only that it DID |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. Deem and Pass saves time and energy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. Where are you posts about not supporting it the 36 times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. No one cares. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm not a teabagger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
23. No problem here - think of it as hyper text (Senate bill) and a list (reconciliation) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. The HCR is a steaming piece of shit. That aside, this is the only feasible way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. + 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
28. Please understand this one overriding fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-17-10 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. THANKS FOR YOUR "CONCERN" - yes I support HCR and I don't care how it gets done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC